The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
James intended to place a Roman Catholic, of the name of Farmer, over
the Fellows at Magdalen College; but the College, instead of accepting
this nominee of the King, chose one of their number, Hough, for their
head. Whereupon, the Ecclesiastical Court, with Jeffreys at its head,
declared the Magdalen election null and void, and Parker, the Bishop
of Oxford, James’s nominee to that see, was forced upon Magdalen as
its President. Parker died in 1688, and James again appointed a Roman
Catholic bishop _in partibus_, Bonaventure Giffard, to take his place.
Previously, the King had visited Oxford, and after abusing the Fellows
for their independence, had expelled five-and-twenty of them. These
arbitrary measures led to a clerical revolt throughout England. In the
April of the following year, James issued a form of indulgence, which
he ordered to be read in all the churches. By this form the King hoped
to unite the Roman Catholics with the Protestant Nonconformists under
the banner of “liberty of conscience” against the Church, and thus
make the Church herself assist in her own defeat by the use of his
ecclesiastical supremacy (Wakeman’s “History of the Church of England”).
The clergy protested, and six bishops, with Sancroft, the Archbishop of
Canterbury, at their head, drew up a petition to the King, protesting
against the form. The petition was most humble; it stated that the
petitioners considered this Declaration of Indulgence to religious
dissenters to be founded “upon such a dispensing power as hath often
been declared illegal by Parliament, and particularly in the years
1662 and 1672, and in the beginning of your Majesty’s reign; and in a
matter of so great moment and consequence to the whole nation, both in
Church and State, your petitioners cannot, in providence, honour, or
conscience, so far make themselves parties to it as the distributors of
it all over the nation, and the solemn publication of it once again,
even in God’s House, and in the time of Divine Service, must amount to
in common and reasonable contention.”
The King read the petition, scowled, and returned it to Sancroft,
saying angrily: “I did not expect this from the Church of England!”
adding, “If I change my mind you shall hear from me; if not, I shall
expect my commands shall be obeyed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account