The Town: Its Memorable Characters and EventsHunt, Leigh
History
The Town: Its Memorable Characters and Events
Hunt, Leigh
London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History
"20th (April, 1667). Met Mr. Rolt, who tells me the reason of
no play to-day at the King's house--that Lacy had been
committed to the porter's lodge, for his acting his part in the
late new play; and being thence released to come to the King's
house, he there met with Ned Howard, the poet of the play, who
congratulated his release; upon which Lacy cursed him, as that
it was the fault of his nonsensical play that was the cause of
his ill-usage. Mr. Howard did give him some reply, to which
Lacy answered him that he was more a fool than a poet; upon
which Howard did give him a blow on the face with his glove;
on which Lacy, having a cane in his hand, did give him a blow
over the pate. Here Rolt and others, that discoursed of it in
the pit, did wonder that Howard did not run him through, he
being too mean a fellow to fight with. But Howard did not do
anything but complain to the King; so the whole house is
silenced: and the gentry seem to rejoice much at it, the house
being become too insolent.
"1st (May, 1667). Thence away to the King's playhouse, and saw
'Love in a Maze:' but a sorry play; only Lacy's clown's part,
which he did most admirably indeed; and I am glad to find the
rogue at liberty again. Here was but little, and that ordinary
company. We sat at the upper bench, next the boxes; and I find
it do pretty well, and have the advantage of seeing and hearing
the great people, which may be pleasant when there is good
store.
"15th (August, 1667). And so we went to the King's house, and
there saw 'The Merry Wives of Windsor;' which did not please me
at all, in no part of it.
"17th (August, 1667). To the King's playhouse, where the house
extraordinary full; and there the King and Duke of York to see
the new play, 'Queene Elizabeth's Troubles, and the History of
Eighty-eight.' I confess I have sucked in so much of the sad
story of Queene Elizabeth from my cradle, that I was ready to
weep for her sometimes; but the play is the most ridiculous
that sure ever came upon stage, and, indeed, is merely a show,
only shows the true garb of the Queene in those days, just as
we see Queene Mary and Queene Elizabeth painted; but the play
is merely a puppet play, acted by living puppets. Neither the
design nor language better; and one stands by and tells us the
meaning of things: only I was pleased to see Knipp dance among
the milkmaids, and to hear her sing a song to Queene Elizabeth,
and to see her come out in her nighte-gown with no lockes on,
but her bare face, and hair only tied up in a knot behind;
which is the comeliest dress that ever I saw her in to her
advantage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account