Every decision was against the prisoner, though, in deference to the
distinguished character of the lawyers for the defence, they were
allowed to argue each point. The profound and accurate learning with
which they reviewed the Constitutional law of the Republic was a liberal
education to the shallow little partisans who sat on the judge’s bench
before them. But their eloquence and learning fell on the ears of men
whose decisions were already made.
In violation of the rights of the prisoner under the constitutions of
the state and nation the indictment for murder was ordered to immediate
trial.
From the moment the actual proceedings of the trial began, the
Government had no delay or difficulty.
With sinking heart Stella saw the disgraceful travesty of justice draw
each moment the cords of death closer about the form of the man she
loved.
The jury corruptly chosen for this case marked the lowest tide mud to
which the administration of justice ever sank in our history. A white
freeman, a man of culture and heroic mould, whose fathers created the
American Republic, was arraigned to plead for his life before a jury
composed of one dirty, ignorant white scalawag and eleven coal-black
Negroes! The white man was not made its foreman, a Negro teamster was
chosen.
Steve Hoyle became at once the presiding genius of the prosecution. The
court room was thronged with liars, perjurers and sycophants who hung
about his fat figure with obsequious deference. Old Larkin, who came
from the Capitol to assist the prosecution, sat constantly by Steve’s
side.
John Graham watched Steve with cold deadly hate, but he had warned his
men under no conceivable circumstances to lift a hand in resistance
either to constituted authority, or to give the traitor his deserts.
A pall of helpless grief and fear hung over every decent white man who
witnessed the High Court of Justice of the Anglo-Saxon race suddenly
transformed into a Negro minstrel farce on which hung their liberty and
life.
The star witness of the prosecution was Uncle Isaac A. Postle. He took
his seat before the jury, grinning and nodding at two of his dusky
friends among them with calm assurance.
Isaac was allowed to tell a marvellous rambling story of Ku Klux
outrages--stories which he had heard from Larkin--about whose truth
he could possibly know nothing. In vain the lawyers for the defence
objected. The court overruled every objection and allowed the Apostle
free scope to his vivid imagination.
Reverdy Johnson, the distinguished ex-Attorney General of the United
States who stood before the judges protesting with dignity, bowed to the
Bench and sat down in disgust with the quiet remark:
“We shall offer no further objection to anything that may be said in
this Court.”
He had scarcely taken his seat when Ackerman moved his chair behind him
and began to whisper.
The District Attorney watched the detective in astonishment, while Hoyle
and Larkin bent their heads together in excited conference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account