Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
NOTE 2.—The same MS. has here a passage which I am unable to
understand. After the words “300 lbs. and more,” it goes on: “Et
la veoit l’en voler moult loing, desquelles pierres _il en y avoit
plus de_ lx _routes qui tant montoit l’une comme l’autre_.” The Bern
has the same. [Perhaps we might read lx _en routes_, viz. on their
way.—H. C.]
NOTE 3.—I propose here to enter into some detailed explanation
regarding the military engines that were in use in the Middle
Ages.[2] None of these depended for their motive force on _torsion_
like the chief engines used in classic times. However numerous
the names applied to them, with reference to minor variations in
construction or differences in power, they may all be reduced
to two classes, viz. _great slings_ and _great crossbows_. And
this is equally true of all the three great branches of mediæval
civilisation—European, Saracenic, and Chinese. To the first class
belonged the _Trebuchet_ and _Mangonel_; to the second, the
_Winch-Arblast_ (Arbalète à Tour), _Springold_ etc.
Whatever the ancient _Balista_ may have been, the word in mediæval
Latin seems always to mean some kind of crossbow. The heavier
crossbows were wound up by various aids, such as winches, ratchets,
etc. They discharged stone shot, leaden bullets, and short,
square-shafted arrows called _quarrels_, and these with such force
we are told as to pierce a six-inch post (?). But they were worked
so slowly in the field that they were no match for the long-bow,
which shot five or six times to their once. The great machines
of this kind were made of wood, of steel, and very frequently of
horn;[3] and the bow was sometimes more than 30 feet in length.
Dufour calculates that such a machine could shoot an arrow of half
a kilogram in weight to a distance of about 860 yards.
The _Trebuchet_ consisted of a long tapering shaft or beam, pivoted
at a short distance from the butt end on a pair of strong pyramidal
trestles. At the other end of the shaft a sling was applied, one
cord of which was firmly attached by a ring, whilst the other hung
in a loop over an iron hook which formed the extremity of the
shaft. The power employed to discharge the sling was either the
strength of a number of men, applied to ropes which were attached
to the short end of the shaft or lever, or the weight of a heavy
counterpoise hung from the same, and suddenly released.
[Illustration: Mediæval Artillery Engines. Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
Chinese; Figs. 6, 7, 8, Saracenic; the rest Frank.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account