Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
In Ramusio the two Polos propose to Kúblái to make “_mangani al
modo di Ponente_”; and it is worthy of note that in the campaigns
of Aláuddin Khilji and his generals in the Deccan, _circa_ 1300,
frequent mention is made of the _Western Manjaniks_ and their great
power. (See _Elliot_, III. 75, 78, etc.)
Of the kind worked by man-ropes must have been that huge mangonel
which Mahomed Ibn Kásim, the conqueror of Sind, set in battery
against the great Dagoba of Daibul, and which required 500 men to
work it. Like Simon de Montfort’s it had a tender name; it was
called “The Bride.” (_Elliot_, I. 120.)
Before quitting this subject, I will quote a curious passage from
the History of the Sung Dynasty, contributed to the work of Reinaud
and Favé by M. Stanislas Julien: “In the 9th year of the period
Hien-shun (A.D. 1273) the frontier cities had fallen into the hands
of the enemy (Tartars). The _Pao_ (or engines for shooting) of the
Hwei-Hwei (Mahomedans) were imitated, but in imitating them very
ingenious improvements were introduced, and _pao_ of a different
and very superior kind were constructed. Moreover, an extraordinary
method was invented of neutralising the effects of the enemy’s
_pao_. Ropes were made of rice-straw 4 inches thick, and 34 feet
in length. Twenty such ropes were joined, applied to the tops of
buildings, and covered with clay. In this manner the fire-arrows,
fire-_pao_, and even the pao casting stones of 100 lbs. weight,
could cause no damage to the towers or houses.” (_Ib._ 196; also
for previous parts of this note, _Visdelou_, 188; _Gaubil_, 34,
155 _seqq._ and 70; _De Mailla_, 329; _Pauthier in loco_ and
Introduction; _D’Ohsson_, II. 35, and 391; Notes by _Mr. Edward
Thomas_, F.R.S.; _Q. Rashid._, pp. 132, 136.) [See I. p. 342.]
[Captain Gill writes (_River of Golden Sand_, I. p. 148): “The word
‘P’ao’ which now means ‘cannon,’ was, it was asserted, found in old
Chinese books of a date anterior to that in which gunpowder was
first known to Europeans; hence the deduction was drawn that the
Chinese were acquainted with gunpowder before it was used in the
West. But close examination shows that in all old books the radical
of the character ‘P’ao’ means ‘stone,’ but that in modern books the
radical of the character ‘P’ao’ means ‘fire’; that the character
with the radical ‘fire’ only appears in books well known to have
been written since the introduction of gunpowder into the West; and
that the old character ‘P’ao’ in reality means ‘Balista.’”—H. C.]
[Illustration: Coin from a treasure hidden at Siang-yang during the
siege in 1268–73, lately discovered.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account