Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
For assuming that _Cugiu_ was Fortune’s Chuchu at the western
base of the Bohea mountains (see note 3, ch. lxxix.), and that
the traveller reached Tsun-ngan-hien, in two marches, I see that
from Tsin-tsun, near Tsun-ngan-hien, Fortune says he could have
reached Fu-chau in four days by boat. Again Martini, speaking of
the skill with which the Fo-kien boatmen navigate the rocky rapids
of the upper waters, says that even from _Pu-ch’eng_ the descent
to the capital could be made in three days. So the thing is quite
possible, and the G. Text may be quite correct. (See _Fortune_,
II. 171–183 and 210; _Mart._ 110.) A party which recently made the
journey seem to have been six days from _Hokeu_ to the Wu-e-shan
and then five and a half days by water (but in stormy weather) to
Fu-chau. (_Chinese Recorder_, as above.)
NOTE 8.—Pauthier supposes Unken, or _Vuguen_ as he reads it, to be
_Hukwan_, one of the _hiens_ under the immediate administration
of Fu-chau city. This cannot be, according to the lucid reading
of the G. T., making Unken 15 miles from the chief city. The only
place which the maps show about that position is _Min-ts’ing hien_.
And the Dutch mission of 1664–1665 names this as “_Binkin_, by some
called Min-sing.” (_Astley_, III. 461.)
[Mr. Phillips writes (_T. Pao_, I. 224–225): “Going down stream
from Kien-Ning, we arrive first at Yen-Ping on the Min Main River.
Eighty-seven _li_ further down is the mouth of the Yiu-Ki River,
up which stream, at a distance of eighty _li_, is Yiu-Ki city,
where travellers disembark for the land journey to Yung-chun and
Chinchew. This route is the highway from the town of Yiu-Ki to the
seaport of Chinchew. This I consider to have been Polo’s route,
and Ramusio’s Unguen I believe to be Yung-chun, locally known as
Eng-chun or Ung-chun, a name greatly resembling Polo’s Unguen.
I look upon this mere resemblance of name as of small moment in
comparison with the weighty and important statement, that ‘this
place is remarkable for a great manufacture of sugar.’ Going south
from the Min River towards Chinchew, this is the first district
in which sugar-cane is seen growing in any quantity. Between
Kien-Ning-Foo and Fuchau I do not know of any place remarkable
for the _great_ manufacture of sugar. Pauthier makes How-Kuan do
service for Unken or Unguen, but this is inadmissible, as there is
no such place as How-Kuan; it is simply one of the divisions of
the city of Fuchau, which is divided into two districts, viz. the
Min-Hien and the How-Kuan-Hien. A small quantity of sugar-cane is,
I admit, grown in the How-Kuan division of Fuchau-foo, but it is
not extensively made into sugar. The cane grown there is usually
cut into short pieces for chewing and hawked about the streets for
sale. The nearest point to Foochow where sugar is made in any great
quantity is Yung-Foo, a place quite out of Polo’s route. The great
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account