Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
[2] _Note_ by _Mr. C. Phillips_. I omit a corroborative quotation about
sugar from the Turkish Geography, copied from Klaproth in the
former edition; because the author, Hajji Khalfa, used European
sources; and I have no doubt the passage was derived indirectly
from Marco Polo.
[3] _Note_ by _Mr. G. Phillips_.
CHAPTER LXXXI.
CONCERNING THE GREATNESS OF THE CITY OF FUJU.
Now this city of Fuju is the key of the kingdom which is called CHONKA,
and which is one of the nine great divisions of Manzi.{1} The city is
a seat of great trade and great manufactures. The people are Idolaters
and subject to the Great Kaan. And a large garrison is maintained there
by that prince to keep the kingdom in peace and subjection. For the
city is one which is apt to revolt on very slight provocation.
There flows through the middle of this city a great river, which is
about a mile in width, and many ships are built at the city which
are launched upon this river. Enormous quantities of sugar are made
there, and there is a great traffic in pearls and precious stones. For
many ships of India come to these parts bringing many merchants who
traffic about the Isles of the Indies. For this city is, as I must
tell you, in the vicinity of the Ocean Port of ZAYTON,{2} which is
greatly frequented by the ships of India with their cargoes of various
merchandize; and from Zayton ships come this way right up to the city
of Fuju by the river I have told you of; and ’tis in this way that the
precious wares of India come hither.{3}
The city is really a very fine one and kept in good order, and all
necessaries of life are there to be had in great abundance and
cheapness.
NOTE 1.—The name here applied to Fo-kien by Polo is variously
written as _Choncha, Chonka, Concha, Chouka_. It has not been
satisfactorily explained. Klaproth and Neumann refer it to
_Kiang-Ché_, of which Fo-kien at one time of the Mongol rule formed
a part. This is the more improbable as Polo expressly distinguishes
this province or kingdom from that which was under Kinsay, viz.
Kiang-Ché. Pauthier supposes the word to represent _Kien-Kwé_, “the
Kingdom of Kien,” because in the 8th century this territory had
formed a principality of which the seat was at _Kien-chau_, now
Kien-ning fu. This is not satisfactory either, for no evidence is
adduced that the name continued in use.
One might suppose that _Choncha_ represented _T’swan-chau_, the
Chinese name of the city of Zayton, or rather of the department
attached to it, written by the French _Thsiuan-tchéou_, but by
Medhurst _Chwanchew_, were it not that Polo’s practice of writing
the term _tchéu_ or _chau_ by _giu_ is so nearly invariable, and
that the soft _ch_ is almost always expressed in the old texts by
the Italian _ci_ (though the Venetian does use the soft _ch_).[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account