Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
[Mendoza already said: “It is an admirable thing to consider how
that in that kingdome they doo speake manie languages, the one
differing from the other: yet generallie in writing they doo
understand one the other, and in speaking not.” (_Parke’s Transl._
p. 93.)]
Professor Kidd, speaking of his instructors in the Mandarin and
Fo-kien dialects respectively, says: “The teachers in both cases
read the same books, composed in the same style, and attached
precisely the same ideas to the written symbols, but could not
understand each other in conversation.” Moreover, besides these
sounds attaching to the Chinese characters when read in the dialect
of Fo-kien, thus discrepant from the sounds used in reading the
same characters in the Mandarin dialect, yet _another_ class of
sounds is used to express the same ideas in the Fo-kien dialect
when it is used colloquially and without reference to written
symbols! (_Kidd’s China_, etc., pp. 21–23.)
The term _Fokien dialect_ in the preceding passage is ambiguous,
as will be seen from the following remarks, which have been
derived from the Preface and Appendices to the Rev. Dr. Douglas’s
Dictionary of the Spoken Language of Amoy,[6] and which throw a
distinct light on the subject of this note:—
“The vernacular or spoken language of Amoy is not a mere colloquial
dialect or _patois_, it is a _distinct language_—one of the many
and widely differing spoken languages which divide among them
the soil of China. For these spoken languages are not _dialects_
of one language, but cognate languages, bearing to each other a
relation similar to that between Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac, or
between English, Dutch, German, and Danish. The so-called ‘_written
language_’ is indeed uniform throughout the whole country, but that
is rather a _notation_ than a language. And this written language,
as read aloud from books, is not _spoken_ in any place whatever,
under any form of pronunciation. The most learned men never employ
it as a means of ordinary oral communication even among themselves.
It is, in fact, a _dead language_, related to the various spoken
languages of China, somewhat as Latin is to the languages of
Southern Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account