The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
[480] The allusion is to the title of Patrician given to Pippin and to
his sons as defenders of the Roman See.
[481] The office of consul as it existed in the Republic and the Empire
disappeared in the time of the German invasions. The word was later
applied quite differently, to a group, practically a social class, at
Rome.
[482] Where Valla’s text of the Donation reads “concubitorum,” Zeumer’s
reads “excubiorum” [guards].
[483] Martial, XIV, 141 (140).
[484] Valla for this part of his criticism uses the rather unintelligible
order of words found in most texts of the Donation, instead of the more
intelligible order which he used in his earlier quotations. Cf. pp. 102,
103.
[485] Valla’s text of the Donation in this paragraph differs greatly from
Zeumer’s, Hinschius’, and Friedberg’s. It is not very clear in any of
the texts whether the intent is to give the Pope power to take any one
whomsoever into the clergy and thus relieve him from civil and military
duties, or to prevent the Roman nobility from forcing their way into
ecclesiastical offices against the will of the Pope.
[486] Ps. xxi, 3, with variation.
[487] Valla does not, here, quote his own text of the Donation correctly.
[488] This singular confusion about the crown in the Donation is
explained by Brunner, Festgabe für Rudolf von Gneist, pp. 25 _et seq._,
as giving the Pope the possession, but not the use, of the imperial
crown, thus paving the way for his prerogative of conferring the crown
upon Louis the Pious in 816. Scheffer-Boichorst takes the whole episode
as an attempt of the forger to glorify Sylvester by having the emperor
honor him with the imperial crown, and having the Pope display the
clerical humility (and pride) of rejecting it.
[489] Valla’s text of the Donation here has “sive” for “seu,” cf.
_supra_, p. 91, note 1. In the whole paragraph there are many deviations
from other texts of the Donation.
[490] Cf. _supra_, pp. 41 _et seq._, 49 _et seq._
[491] This phrase as used in the Donation probably meant Lombardy,
Venetia and Istria; i.e., practically, northern, as distinct from
peninsular, Italy. Cf. _supra_, p. 27, note 2, also, Döllinger,
Papstfabeln (ed. Friedrich), p. 122, note. In classical Latin it would
have been, as Valla insists, a vague term.
[492] Cf. _supra_, pp. 91, 109.
[493] Cf. _supra_, p. 95.
[494] King [rex] was a forbidden title at Rome after the time of the
Tarquins.
[495] A parody on Matt. v, 18.
[496] Rev. xxii, 18-19.
[497] “Pagina” in medieval Latin often meant “document.”
[498] In the Liber Pontificalis (ed. Duchesne, i, 454) the keys of
Ravenna and other cities included in the so-called Donation of Pippin are
said to have been placed in “the confession of St. Peter” (i.e., before
his tomb). This association seems to have been common in the eighth
century.
[499] Cf. _supra_, p. 85.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account