The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
Mr. Gilpin knew Dr. Brown’s “Letter,” for in his Cumberland “Tour”
(1772) he justified his own preference for Keswick by saying that this
region had also been singled out by Dr. Brown, “who was a man of taste
and had seen every part of this country.” Mr. Hutchinson quoted the
whole of the “Letter.” Mr. West went to Keswick with the “Letter” in
hand, trembling with eagerness to experience the joys it depicted.
Certainly this “Letter from Keswick” in the delight with which it
dwells on the wild and terrible elements of Nature, in its detailed
observation, in its artistic appreciation of the accidental effects
of atmospheric conditions, and in its sensitiveness to the spirit of
the place, comes very close to the modern enthusiasm for mountains.
The details are sometimes exaggerated and the author’s rapture may
seem over-stated, but the genuineness of his feeling, and the reality
of his knowledge of mountains and lake, must remain unquestioned. The
“Letter” is one of the first, and the most considerable of the early
contributions to the literature of the Lakes.
The great period of English travels began in 1767 with Arthur Young’s
“Six Weeks’ Tour in the Southern Counties of England and Wales.” In
1768 (June to November) he wrote his “Six Months’ Tour in the North of
England.” His next important work, “A Farmer’s Tour through the East
of England,” was published in 1771. His “Tour in Ireland” appeared
in 1779. The professed design of these sketches was husbandry.
Agriculture, industry, population, farming experiments, prices,
laws--these were the topics on which he wished to inform himself
and others. He had apparently, in his original plan, no thought of
describing the country through which he passed. There is in this
respect a significant difference between the books of 1767–68 and
that of 1779. In the first two he kept the text rigorously free from
all weakening admixture of landscape, the enthusiastic descriptions
of scenery appearing as footnotes. In the last, the descriptions
are boldly incorporated into the text, and form, what is more, a
surprisingly large proportion of it. In 1767–68 he described such
places as he happened to pass near. In 1779 he followed up one
river and down another professedly in search of “wild and romantic
landscapes.” In general character, however, the descriptions do not
greatly vary in the three books. The most numerous descriptions are of
gentlemen’s estates, perhaps in courteous repayment of hospitalities
received. These accounts are always detailed and often tedious. Young
apparently went about with the polite owner, sat in his seats, looked
down his vistas, observed his temples, and took notes thereon. Our
chief interest in these passages is the testimony they bear to Young’s
own preference for estates where art had done the least and Nature
most. “The owner has had the good judgment merely to assist nature,” or
“merely to render natural beauties accessible” are characteristic words
of praise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account