The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
They have either left us hideous and literal transcripts of
the awkward, tight-laced, behooped, and bewigged generation of
beaux and belles before them; or, quitting all probability,
or even possibility, have given us Arcadian shepherdesses,
and soi-disant Greeks and Romans, where wigs and flounces and
frippery mingle with crooks, sheep, thunderbolts, and Roman
draperies.[576]
The darkness that seemed thus at the middle of the century to be
settling down around the art of portrait painting was, however, the
darkness that precedes the dawn, or, in this instance, the full day,
for with the first portraits of Sir Joshua Reynolds after he returned
from Rome in 1752, and with the work of Thomas Gainsborough, his
immediate contemporary, we enter upon the supreme period of British
portraiture, a period in which there seemed suddenly to spring into
being all the grace and skill, all the sense of beauty and poetry,
all the power of imaginative interpretation, that had been waning in
English art annals since the days of Vandyck. And with this great
revival in the art there came a striking revival of interest in the use
of landscape in portraiture.
Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723–92) made use of landscape backgrounds in
portraits of various kinds. His full-length portrait of Keppel was
completed in 1753 and was the picture that established his fame. It is
thus described by Lord Gower: “The gallant young sailor is represented
as literally walking out of the canvas. His countenance is full of
animation, and as he seems to step briskly, bareheaded, across the
beach, his locks are blown backward from his forehead by the gale....
In the background a wild sea breaks on the shore.” This portrait, says
Lord Gower, “made an epoch in that form of art.”[577] The epoch-making
characteristics of the picture were, in the first place, the striking
animation and naturalness of the figure as opposed to the monotony
and woodenness of pose adopted by artists such as Hudson, and, in the
second place, the genuine open-air effect of the whole picture, the
perfectly simple and natural union of the figure and the landscape. In
some other portraits of men Reynolds made use of landscape backgrounds,
as in the half-lengths of Admiral Keppel (1780) and that of Lord
Heathfield (1787) in which the figures stand forth boldly against a
stormy sky with a suggestion of an ocean view. Some landscapes show
reminiscences of Vandyck, as in the backgrounds of the equestrian
portraits of Captain Orme (exhibited 1761) and Lord Ligonier[578]
(about 1760), or in the conventionalized tree-trunks and distant view
in the half-length of the archbishop of Armagh.[579] It is, however, in
full-lengths of women and children, either singly or in groups, that
Sir Joshua makes freest use of landscape. The little Princess Sophia
Matilda of Gloucester, a chubby baby rolling on the grass with her
dog; Prince William of Gloucester in plum-colored cavalier costume
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account