The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
There is in the South Kensington Museum
a beautiful canvas by Gilpin called “Cows in a Landscape.” It has a
smooth, clear, decorative effect, the cows are broadly, simply, but
realistically painted, and the landscape gives in most suggestive
fashion the mists, the faintly illumined sky, the dewy feeling, of
early morning.[636]
[Illustration: LODORE WATERFALL
_By Joseph Farington_]
The men enumerated in the preceding paragraph did all of their work,
or, in a few cases such as Paul Sandby and Sawrey Gilpin who painted
through the century, did much of their most characteristic work, before
1785. There is still another group of men who were born about the
middle of the century the bulk of whose work, or whose most significant
work, belongs before 1800. Of professional marine painters we have
Robert Cleveley who began to exhibit in 1780; the more celebrated
Nicholas Pocock (1741–1821); and John Thomas Serres (1759–1825), all
of whom carried on the traditional representation of noted ships,
harbors, and naval actions. David Allan’s (1744–96) best work is
his set of illustrations of “The Gentle Shepherd.” He went to the
Pentland Hills and studied both the places and the people he wished
to represent. “He visited,” says Cunningham, “every hill, dale, tree,
stream, and cottage, which could be admitted into the landscape of the
poet.... Glaid’s farm house, the Monk’s burn, the Linn, the Washing
Green, Habbie’s How, New Hall House, and that little breast-deep basin
in the burn, called Peggie’s pool, were all carefully drawn.” It was
Allan’s endeavor to do in painting what Ramsay had done half a century
before in poetry, and though his pictures are far from expressing the
brightness and beauty of the poem, they fairly take rank as important
attempts to represent native landscapes from careful, first-hand
observation. James de Loutherbourg (1740–1812) came to England about
1770, and was constantly represented in the exhibitions during the
rest of the century. His vigorous storms and sea-scapes were long
popular. The public taste that could laud De Loutherbourg’s pictures
and neglect Wilson’s was severely satirized by “Peter Pindar.”[637]
But De Loutherbourg has another claim to recognition in that he
was one of the staunchest defenders of the picturesque scenery of the
British Isles as against that of other lands. He maintained that no
English painter need go abroad for inspiration when he had access to
the Highlands of Scotland, the Lake District of Cumberland, and the
mountainous region of North Wales. It was to further this idea that
he opened his panorama of English scenery in 1782, a show by which
Gainsborough was fascinated, and which, apparently, prompted his visit
to the Lakes in 1783.[638] Thomas Hearne (1744–1817) is of importance
in the early history of water-color. In 1777 he began a series of tours
through Great Britain for the purpose of illustrating “The Antiquities
of Great Britain” for which he made fifty-two drawings. Mr. Cosmo
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account