The Treaty of Waitangi; or, how New Zealand became a British ColonyBuick, Thomas Lindsay
History
The Treaty of Waitangi; or, how New Zealand became a British Colony
Buick, Thomas Lindsay
New Zealand -- Politics and government; Treaty of Waitangi (1840)
Hurrying back to Auckland, Shortland called a meeting of his Council,
and there sought some enlightenment as to this new view-point of the
Maori status under the treaty. Amongst those consulted was necessarily
Mr. Clarke, the erstwhile Missionary, and now Chief Protector of the
Aborigines, whose close and constant intercourse with all the tribes
gave him the most favourable facilities for gauging the strength and
direction of the native aspirations. In the course of his examination
Mr. Clarke was asked:
(1) Do the natives who signed the Treaty of Waitangi acknowledge
themselves to be British subjects?
To which he replied:--The natives who signed the Treaty of Waitangi,
having been solemnly assured by Her Majesty's representative, the
late Captain Hobson, that they should in the fullest sense of the
term be entitled to all the privileges of British subjects, consented
to be considered as such, with a full understanding that their
allegiance depended upon the British Government fulfilling their
engagements in that treaty.
(2) How far, and to what extent, do the various tribes in New Zealand
acknowledge the Queen's sovereignty?
To this Mr. Clarke's answer was:--The natives alone who signed the
treaty acknowledge the Queen's sovereignty, and that only in a
limited sense. The treaty guaranteeing their own customs to them,
they acknowledge a right of interference only in grave cases, such as
war and murder, and all disputes and offences between themselves and
Europeans, and hitherto they have acted on this principle. The
natives who have not signed the treaty consider that the British
Government, in common with themselves, have a right to interfere in
all cases of dispute between their tribes and Europeans, but limit
British interference to European British subjects.
(3) In your communications with the natives, have you asserted that
they are British subjects, and the right of the Government to
interfere with them as such? and (4) On making that assertion how far
has it been acquiesced in?:--In all my communications with the
natives I have been instructed to assert, and have always asserted,
that they are British subjects, and amenable to British authority, in
which very few, even those who signed the treaty, would acquiesce,
save in matters relating to disputes or depredations upon each other
(viz. differences between Europeans and natives).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account