Mystery fiction; Trials (Murder) -- Fiction; United States -- Fiction
Well, there at Warner's house she came out to me later, told me how
he'd talked more quietly a while, forgetting much of the present,
and taking pleasure in the sound of ocean, which no one else would
hear in this inland town, but he could hear it out of childhood. He
died that night.
My letter to Paulus was, as I said, too cerebral, and that's why it
has left me discontented, aware of much that still ought to be
said.
In that letter I marshalled all the familiar arguments against
capital punishment, for the sake of logic and completeness. Paulus
has heard them all, and so have most citizens above the moron
level. Capital punishment does not deter, nor have any effect on
the crime rate one way or another--repeatedly demonstrated by
statistical study long before the time of Warden Lawes; vengeance
does not restore life, but only adds another evil, namely murder by
the state; there can never be complete assurance that the innocent
will not be punished and the guilty go free; punishment itself
serves no purpose except to excite the self-deceptive emotions of
the punisher; and so on, Jack. While I listed and discussed these
and lesser arguments in my letter, I grew increasingly
discouraged, mostly by realization that it has all been said
before, more persuasively than I know how to say it, that the
arguments on the other side seem (at least to my best
understanding) monstrously shabby, unrealistic, archaic, some of
them plain sadism with its nakedness barely hidden by doubletalk,
and yet the laws remain on the books.
You're a headshrinker, Jack--why do so many minds cling to unreason
with such a sullen fury? I am thinking of people like Judge
Cleever, or people who can read the entire transcript of the
Sacco-Vanzetti trial and still declare briskly and earnestly that
the innocent are never punished. How do they do it? What's the
faculty of the mind that makes it possible for an intelligent being
to look directly on a glaring fact and somehow will it out of
sight? For my part I _cannot_, from sheer physical inability,
believe a lie when the demonstration is before me.
And so finally, when I had done all I could with the clear,
sensible, familiar arguments that have beaten on Paulus' head for
forty-odd years without ever moving him to act on them, I found
that I was closing my discourse with nothing more nor less than a
plea for humility.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account