The question of the number of members that were present at the different
meetings of the Sanhedrin has been discussed in the light of history,
and as bearing upon the conduct of Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea,
who were friends of Jesus. Nicodemus was certainly a member of the Great
Sanhedrin. This we learn from two passages of New Testament
scripture.[290] It is also believed that Joseph of Arimathea was a
member from a mere suggestion in another passage.[291] Did these friends
of the Christ vote against Him? If they were members of the court; if
Matthew and Mark wrote literally when they said that "all the council"
were present; and if Mark wrote literally and truthfully when he said
that "they _all_ condemned him to be guilty of death"; then it naturally
and inevitably follows that both Nicodemus and Joseph voted against
Jesus.
[Illustration: THE ARREST OF JESUS (HOFFMAN)]
A number of arguments have been offered against this contention. In the
first place, it is said that at a previous meeting of the Sanhedrin
Nicodemus defended Jesus by asking his fellow-judges this question:
"Doth our law judge any man before it hear him and know what he
doeth?"[292] It is asserted that there is no good reason to believe that
Nicodemus defended Jesus at this meeting and turned against Him at a
subsequent one, that there is a presumption of a continuance of
fidelity. But is this good reasoning? Did not Peter cut off the ear of
the high priest's servant, Malchus, in defense of Jesus at midnight, in
the garden, and then within three hours afterwards deny that he knew
Jesus? There is no good reason to believe that Nicodemus was braver or
more constant than Peter, for the former seems to have been either
ashamed or afraid to express his affection for the Master during the
daytime, but preferred to do it at night.[293]
Concerning the part taken by Nicodemus in the final proceedings, Rosadi
says: "The verdict was unanimous. The members of the Sanhedrin who were
secretly favorable to the Accused were either absent or else they voted
against him. Nicodemus was amongst the absentees, or amongst those that
voted against him. At all events, he did not raise his voice against the
pronouncement expressed by acclamation."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account