(4) _No man was qualified to be a judge who had dealt in the fruits of
the seventh year._
Such a person was deemed lacking in conscience and unfitted to perform
judicial functions.
(5) _No man who was concerned or interested in a matter to be
adjudicated was qualified to sit in judgment thereon._
This is a universal disqualification of judges under all enlightened
systems of justice. The weakness and selfishness of human nature are
such that few men are qualified to judge impartially where their own
interests are involved.
(6) _All relatives of the accused man, of whatever degree of
consanguinity, were disqualified from sitting in judgment on his case._
This is only a variation of the disqualification of interest.
(7) _No person who would be benefited, as heir, or otherwise, by the
death or condemnation of an accused man, was qualified to be his judge._
This, too, is a variation of the disqualification of interest.
(8) _The king could not be a member of the Sanhedrin._
Royalty disqualified from holding the place of judge because of the
high station of the king and because his exercising judicial functions
might hamper the administration of justice.
And, finally, in closing the enumeration of disqualifications, it may be
added that an election to a seat obtained by fraud or any unfair means
was null and void. No respect was shown for the piety or learning of
such a judge; his judicial mantle was spat upon with scorn, and his
fellow judges fled from him as from a plague or pest. Hebrew contempt
for such a judge was expressed in the maxim: "The robe of the unfairly
elected judge is to be respected not more than the blanket of an ass."
_Officers of the Great Sanhedrin._--Two presiding officers directed the
proceedings of the Great Sanhedrin. One of these, styled _prince_
(nasi), was the chief and the president of the court. The other, known
as the _father of the Tribunal_ (ab-beth-din), was the vice-president.
There has been much discussion among the historians as to the particular
chamber from which the president was chosen. Some have contended that
the presidency of the Sanhedrin belonged by right to the high priest.
But the facts of history do not sustain this contention. Aaron was high
priest at the time when Moses was president of the first Sanhedrin in
the Wilderness; and, besides, the list of presidents preserved by the
Talmud reveals the names of many who did not belong to the priesthood.
Maimonides has made the following very apt observation on the subject:
"Whoever surpassed his colleagues in wisdom was made by them chief of
the Sanhedrin."[94]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account