The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle agesHueffer, Francis
History
The troubadours : $b A history of Provençal life and literature in the middle ages
Hueffer, Francis
Provençal poetry -- History and criticism; Troubadours
By these various methods, the stanza was strictly divided into different
parts. But, on the other hand, the feeling of the troubadours for unity
and harmony was too keen not to make it desirable to bridge over somehow
the gap made by the volta, and to preserve the connection between the
two sides. This was done by means of the rhyme, which, as has been seen,
was used for a similar purpose between the different stanzas of a poem.
This process is called by Dante concatenatio; and this concatenatio might
be effected in two different ways. The first and simpler mode consists
in the cauda or versus adopting one or several rhymes of the frons or
pedes. This is the course usually followed; and almost all the stanzas
above quoted may serve as examples. So in Bertrand de Born’s poem the
cauda repeats both the rhymes of the frons. In Guillem IX.’s stanza the
versus take up the only rhyme of the frons, adding a new one of their
own. This concatenatio, however, was not considered absolutely necessary;
and Peire d’Alvernhe, for instance, one of the most finished troubadours,
introduces into the versus of his stanza rhymes entirely different from
those found in the pedes. Another kind of concatenatio is effected by
adding, either before or after the volta, a line which contains the rhyme
of the other part of the stanza. How the troubadours contrived not to
disturb the flow of their melody by this new and seemingly inharmonious
element it is difficult to say. Perhaps it was sung to a sort of
recitative or arioso of its own, which served as a prelude to the new
melody of the second part. The meaning of this will be clearly shown by
the following stanza by Raimbaut de Vaqueiras:
Era pot hom conoisser e proar
Que de bos faitz ren deus bon gazardo,
qu’al pro Marques n’a fait esmend’e do,
quel fai son pretz sobrels melhors pojar;
si quel crozat de Frans e de Campanha
l’an quist a deu per lo melhor de totz,
e per cobrar lo sepulcr’e la crotz
on fon Ihesus, qu’el vol en sa companha
l’onrat marques, et al deus dat poder
de bos vassalhs e de terr’e d’aver
e de ric cor per melhs far so quel tanha.
This stanza consists of a frons and two versus of three lines each. The
first four lines are a whole in themselves; and after them the frons
ought to be concluded by the volta, as is indicated by the punctuation
after ‘pojar.’ But the poet adds a fifth line, in order to introduce a
rhyme from the versus, and in this way effects the concatenatio he needs.
There was yet another way of connecting the two parts of the stanza which
might in a certain sense also be called concatenatio, but which was
seemingly unknown to Dante. The following stanza of Cercalmont’s,
Senhors e dompnas gerpira
s’a lei plagues queu li servis,
e quem diria m’en partis,
fariam morir des era,
qu’en autra non ai mon esper
noit ni jorn ni matin ni ser,
ni d’als mos cors no consira,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account