The True George Washington [10th Ed.]Ford, Paul Leicester
History
The True George Washington [10th Ed.]
Ford, Paul Leicester
Generals -- United States -- Biography; Presidents -- United States -- Biography; Washington, George, 1732-1799
The command of the Continental army brought a new kind of friend, in
the young aides of his staff. One of his earliest appointments was
Joseph Reed, and, though he remained but five months in the service, a
close friendship was formed. Almost weekly Washington wrote him in the
most confidential and affectionate manner, and twice he appealed to
Reed to take the position once more, in one instance adding that if
“you are disposed to continue with me, I shall think myself too
fortunate and happy to wish for a change.” Yet Washington none the less
sent Reed congratulations on his election to the Pennsylvania Assembly,
“although I consider it the coup-de-grace to my ever seeing you” again
a “member of my family,” to help him he asked a friend to endeavor to
get Reed legal business, and when all law business ceased and the
would-be lawyer was without occupation or means of support, he used his
influence to secure him the appointment of adjutant.
Reed kept him informed as to the news of Philadelphia, and wrote even
such adverse criticism of the General as he heard, which Washington
“gratefully” acknowledged. But one criticism Reed did not write was
what he himself was saying of his general after the fall of Fort
Washington, for which he blamed the commander-in-chief in a letter to
Lee, and probably to others, for when later Reed and Arnold quarrelled,
the latter boasted that “I can say I never basked in the sunshine of my
general’s favor, and courted him to his face, when I was at the same
time treating him with the greatest disrespect and villifying his
character when absent. This is more than a ruling member of the Council
of Pennsylvania can say.” Washington learned of this criticism in a
letter from Lee to Reed, which was opened at head-quarters on the
supposition that it was on army matters, and “with no idea of its being
a private letter, much less the tendency of the correspondence,” as
Washington explained in a letter to Reed, which had not a word of
reproach for the double-dealing that must have cut the General keenly,
coming as it did at a moment of misfortune and discouragement. Reed
wrote a lame explanation and apology, and later sought to “regain” the
“lost friendship” by an earnest appeal to Washington’s generosity. Nor
did he appeal in vain, for the General replied that though “I felt
myself hurt by a certain letter … I was hurt … because the same
sentiments were not communicated immediately to myself.” The old-time
intimacy was renewed, and how little his personal feeling had
influenced Washington is shown in the fact that even previous to this
peace-making he had secured for Reed the appointment to command one of
the choicest brigades in the army. Perhaps the friendship was never
quite as close, but in writing him Washington still signed himself
“yours affectionately.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account