The True History of the State Prisoner, commonly called the Iron Mask: Extracted from Documents in the French ArchivesDover, George Agar Ellis, Baron
History
The True History of the State Prisoner, commonly called the Iron Mask: Extracted from Documents in the French Archives
Dover, George Agar Ellis, Baron
Man in the Iron Mask; Mattioli, Ercole Antonio, conte, 1640-1703; Prisoners -- France -- 17th century
M. d’Asfeld writes in this intention, to M. de Louvois; but I will
take the liberty to request you, Sir, in case the King has any new
orders to give us on this affair, to order them to be sent directly
to me; because, as it is possible that M. d’Asfeld may be obliged
to depart before they arrive, I could not be made acquainted with
them if they were sent to him, the cypher he has received from M. de
Louvois being different to that which you have sent me. We think,
nevertheless, we can assure you, Sir, that we do not see, from this
delay of time, any reason to doubt the sincerity of the sentiments
of the Duke of Mantua; who has again assured us, through the Count
Matthioli, that he is more than ever in the intention of executing
the treaty he has just made with his Majesty, and of keeping the
promise he has given to him.
The Count Matthioli had written to you; but as his letter was not in
cypher, and did not contain any thing but what I have sent you word
of in this, I have not thought it necessary to send it to you.
DE PINCHESNE.[243]
[243] From the Archives of the Office for Foreign Affairs, at
Paris.
No. 64.
LOUVOIS TO SAINT-MARS.
St. Germain, February 15th, 1679.
* * * * * *
WHEN the affairs for which the Sieur de Richemont is with you shall
be concluded, you may, &c.[244] * * *
DE LOUVOIS.[245]
[244] The sentence is left thus imperfect in M. Delort’s
publication. The whole letter, however, is published in the
work entitled, “Les philosophes et les gens de lettres des
XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles à la Bastille.” The rest of the letter
does not refer to Matthioli’s affair.
[245] From the Archives of France.
No. 65.
POMPONNE TO PINCHESNE.
February 17th, 1679.
I HAVE given an account to the King of what you tell me, in your
last letter of the 28th of January, you have done concerning the
affair which is entrusted to you, and of your expecting the Count
Matthioli soon, from the assurance that the Sieur Giuliani had given
you to that effect. His Majesty was very glad to see that you still
have hopes both of the success of the affair, and of prevailing
upon the Duke of Mantua to leave Venice on the 20th or 25th of this
month.
I have nothing particular to acquaint you with, beyond what you
already know. You will continue, if you please, to inform me exactly
of all that shall pass on this subject; even despatching me an
extraordinary courier if you shall deem it necessary.
POMPONNE.[246]
[246] From the Archives of the Office for Foreign Affairs, at
Paris.
No. 66.
PINCHESNE TO POMPONNE.
Reasons for the Duke of Mantua’s delay in going to Casale.
Venice, February 18th, 1679.
SIR,
* * * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account