The Truth About Port ArthurNozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
History
The Truth About Port Arthur
Nozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905
'From Chi-kuan-shan it is reported that heavy casualties are
occurring from grenades thrown by the enemy. We have not been able
to reoccupy the parapet. I therefore propose to avail myself of
your permission to blow up the casemates, and I have ordered the
garrison to hold on till our sappers have got the mines ready.
As a precautionary measure and to cover the garrison during the
retirement, please move one company temporarily from the main reserve
to the Ice-house. I am just going to Colonel Glagoleff to give the
necessary instructions on the spot.'
_Telephone Message from Colonel Dmitrevsky (Chief Staff Officer to
General Fock) to General Gorbatovsky. 9.40 p.m., December 18, 1904._
'General Fock fully concurs in your opinion about Chi-kuan-shan. He
trusts that you will see that the repairs to Kuropatkin Lunette are
energetically carried out.'
At 11.30 p.m., in accordance with orders received direct from General
Fock, commanding the land defences, the garrison, after destroying the
entrance bridge, abandoned the fort, which for four months had been
held, despite much desperate and bloody fighting. Although General
Gorbatovsky in his message at 9.35 p.m. on December 18 proposed to
avail himself of the permission given in the previous messages and to
abandon the fort, he never, in fact, gave the order.
At 11 p.m. he visited the fort to ascertain personally the state of
affairs, and met the men already retiring. When he told them to go
back, they said General Fock had ordered them to withdraw.
Only after four months' awful fighting, tens of thousands of deaths,
countless numbers of wounded, a sea of spilt blood, a hell of human
sufferings, tears, and sorrows, and owing to the difficulties in which
we were, did the enemy succeed in capturing the first of our permanent
forts. And even then it would not have been theirs if Fock (this is the
deliberate opinion of all the most experienced officers) had reinforced
it in time, and had not, on his own responsibility, determined to
abandon it when he did. He carried out his theories in practice, and
made this unnecessary surrender.
Smirnoff--the Commandant of Port Arthur--only learnt of this
deplorable surrender after it had been carried out; for Fock, in
direct contravention of the first principles of discipline, did not
even inform him of his intention. He knew better than to let Smirnoff
have any suspicion of it, and, ignoring him, communicated direct with
Stössel.
This is not fiction, but the plain, unvarnished truth.
Early next day General Fock went to the Commandant to report the loss
of the fort.
'Who, may I ask, gave you permission to abandon it?' asked Smirnoff.
'I received a direct order to that effect, sir, from General Stössel.
It was he who gave the order. How could I have dared to do such a thing
on my own responsibility?'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account