The Truth About Port ArthurNozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
History
The Truth About Port Arthur
Nozhin, E. K. (Evgenii Konstantinovich)
Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905
'But it is odd that he should make such charges against anyone
when he himself not only made no haste, but did not attempt to
leave his quarters when the explosion took place in Fort No. 3 and
Fortification No. 3, and when the Chinese Wall, Rocky Ridge, and Big
Eagle's Nest were being stormed. That he did not leave his quarters
and was practically a stranger to his troops is borne out by the fact
that when, after the surrender, the Japanese were taking over the
garrison as prisoners, and he began talking to some of the men, they
made rude remarks, and were heard asking their officers "who is that
General?" As it was the first time that the majority of officers had
seen him, they had to reply: "I don't know; wait, I'll ask." Only
after inquiries were they able to tell their men, "That is General
Smirnoff, the Commandant of the Fortress."'
Fock, of all people, accused Smirnoff of staying in his quarters, and
of being a stranger to the men! In the foregoing pages I have shown by
facts what Smirnoff was to the Fortress, what he did for its defence,
and how he was thwarted at every turn. As far as is in my power I
have tried as clearly and truly as possible to draw the picture of
the hopelessness of his position. Fock, suddenly appointed Officer
Commanding Land Defences, was indeed the autocrat of the Fortress,
for Stössel was to all intents and purposes his subordinate, and
Smirnoff was ignored. Having telegraphed to the Commander-in-Chief,
Smirnoff awaited the reply, and till it came he was powerless to do
anything, for like a wise man he did not want to make bad worse. But
had it come, and had it been favourable to him, he would soon have got
everything right. Smirnoff invested with authority would have saved
Arthur's honour. Very possibly so many sound men, and so many cripples,
would not have returned to Russia, so many decorations would not have
glittered on the breasts of officers, and the number of widows and
orphans might have been greater; but there would have been no need for
any Commission such as that of General Roop. The highest tribunal of
the nation would have judged those responsible for the lost campaign,
but Arthur would have fallen, and not been surrendered.
'I shall be now believed, perhaps, if I say that no one in Arthur
knew of the above-quoted principle, and no one heard tell of it from
Smirnoff. I only heard it at General Roop's Commission. When asked,
"Did you take any steps to prevent the example of Fort No. 2 being
followed, and to ensure that the principle that a garrison should
resist to the last should not be forgotten?" I at once understood
that the defence was degraded to the level of simple treason, and
that they were trying to mock me. Was it not mockery indeed to ask
me such a question? The Commission knew that the garrison abandoned
the fort not of their own free will but by my order. To this insult I
replied as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account