The Truth of Christianity: Being an Examination of the More Important Arguments For and Against Believing in That ReligionTurton, W. H. (William Harry)
Religion
The Truth of Christianity: Being an Examination of the More Important Arguments For and Against Believing in That Religion
Turton, W. H. (William Harry)
Apologetics
In conclusion, it must be again pointed out that we are only now
considering the _credibility_ of Christianity, and not trying to
make out that it appears a probable religion, at first sight, which
it plainly does not. Only its improbability is not so extremely
great as to make it useless to consider the evidence in its favour.
This is especially so when we remember that this improbability must
have seemed far greater when Christianity was first preached than it
does now, when we are so accustomed to the religion. Yet, as a
matter of fact, the evidence in its favour did outweigh every
difficulty, and finally convince the civilised world. What this
evidence is we proceed to inquire.
CHAPTER XIV.
THAT THE FOUR GOSPELS ARE GENUINE FROM EXTERNAL TESTIMONY.
(_A._) THE UNDISPUTED TESTIMONY.
End of second century; Irenæus, his evidence of great
value.
(_B._) THE ALMOST UNDISPUTED TESTIMONY.
(1.) Justin Martyr, A.D. 150, refers to some Apostolic
_Memoirs_, which were publicly read among Christians;
and his quotations show that these were our
Four Gospels.
(2.) Tatian, Justin's disciple, A.D. 175, wrote the Diatessaron,
or harmony of Four Gospels.
(3.) Marcion, A.D. 140, wrote a Gospel based on St. Luke's.
(_C._) THE DISPUTED TESTIMONY.
(1.) Papias, mentions the first two Gospels by name.
(2.) Aristides, A.D. 125, alludes to some Gospel as well
known.
(3.) The Apostolic Fathers, Polycarp, Ignatius, Clement,
Barnabas, and the Teaching of the Twelve, seem to
contain references to our Gospels.
Having shown in the last chapter that the Christian Religion is
_credible_, we have next to consider what evidence there is in its
favour. Now that it was founded on the alleged miracles and teaching
of Christ, and chiefly on His Resurrection, is admitted by everyone.
So we must first examine whether we have any trustworthy testimony
as to these events; more especially whether the Four Gospels, which
appear to contain such testimony, are genuine. By the _Four
Gospels_, we of course mean those commonly ascribed to SS. Matthew,
Mark, Luke, and John; and by their being _genuine_, we mean that
they were written, or compiled by those persons. And we will first
consider the _external testimony_ borne by early Christian writers
to these Gospels, leaving _the internal evidence_ from the Books
themselves for the next chapter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account