The Truth of Christianity: Being an Examination of the More Important Arguments For and Against Believing in That ReligionTurton, W. H. (William Harry)
Religion
The Truth of Christianity: Being an Examination of the More Important Arguments For and Against Believing in That Religion
Turton, W. H. (William Harry)
Apologetics
Now what conclusion can be drawn from all this? There seem to be
only two alternatives: either the writer, whoever he was, knew as
much about science as we do, or else the knowledge was revealed to
him by God. And if we admit a revelation at all, the latter
certainly seems the less improbable. And this, it may be added, was
the opinion of the great geologist Dana, who said (after carefully
considering the subject) that the coincidences between the
narrative, and the history of the earth as derived from nature, were
such as to imply its Divine origin.[25] We therefore conclude that
this account of the creation was _Divinely revealed_.
[Footnote 25: Bibliotheca Sacra, April, 1885, p. 224.]
CHAPTER IX.
THAT ITS ORIGIN WAS CONFIRMED BY MIRACLES.
Importance of the Pentateuch, as the only record of the origin of
the Jewish Religion.
(_A._) ITS EGYPTIAN REFERENCES.
These are very strongly in favour of its early date;
(1.) In the history of Joseph.
(2.) In the history of Moses.
(3.) In the laws and addresses.
(_B._) ITS LAWS.
These are also in favour of its early date:
(1.) The subjects dealt with.
(2.) Their connection with the history.
(3.) Their wording.
(_C._) THE THEORY OF A LATE-DATE.
There are four chief arguments in favour of this, but they
are not at all convincing:
(1.) The language of the Pentateuch.
(2.) Its composite character.
(3.) Its laws being unknown in later times.
(4.) The finding of Deuteronomy.
(_D._) CONCLUSION.
The Pentateuch was probably written, as it claims to be,
by Moses; and we must therefore admit the miracles
of the Exodus.
We pass on now to the _origin_ of the Jewish Religion--that is to
say, the events connected with the Exodus from Egypt. And as the
only account we have of these is contained in the _Pentateuch_, we
must examine this book carefully. Is it a trustworthy, and, on the
whole, accurate account of the events which it records? And this
depends chiefly on its _date_. Is it a _contemporary_ document,
written by, or in the time of, Moses? And modern discoveries have at
least shown that it may be so. For Egypt was then in such a
civilised state, that it is practically certain that Moses, and the
other leaders of Israel, could have written had they chosen. And as
they somehow or other brought the people out of Egypt, it is
extremely probable that they would have recorded it. But did they,
and do we possess this record in the Pentateuch?
This is the question we have to decide; and we will first consider
the _Egyptian references_ in the Pentateuch, and then its _Laws_,
both of which are very strongly in favour of an early date. Then we
will see what can be said for the opposite theory, or that of a
_late-date_; and lastly, the _conclusion_ to be drawn from admitting
its genuineness.
(_A._) ITS EGYPTIAN REFERENCES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account