The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
The case of Greece caused even greater difficulty. The treaty of
Berlin, it has been shown, contained no specific promise or guarantee
of a cession of territory to Greece. It merely made a recommendation
to that effect, leaving it to the discretion of the Porte whether
to accede to it or not. As Greece had taken no part in the war of
liberation of the Balkans, it had no special claim, except such as
arose from a wish of the Powers to avoid complications in the future.
It was admitted, however, by the Porte that something should be done
in the way of rectifying its frontier in this direction. Another
conference of the Powers at Berlin reported in favour of drawing the
frontier line so as to include in the kingdom of Greece the whole of
both Thessaly and Epirus. This was gladly assented to by Greece, but
was rejected by the Sultan. The Powers, however, were not willing to
back up their proposals by armed force. The French Government, which
had supported the claim of Greece at the Congress, now drew back.
Eventually, after two years of diplomatic labour, a compromise was
arrived at, mainly at the instance of the British Ambassador to the
Porte, Mr. Goschen, who showed infinite skill and patience in dealing
with the Sultan. A line of frontier was agreed to, which conceded to
Greece the whole of Thessaly and about a third part of Epirus. This
line excluded Janina and other districts inhabited by Moslem Albanians,
and also other districts where Greeks predominated, but under the
circumstances it was the most which could be effected without a
resort to arms. Greece had to wait some years before a more complete
settlement could be secured to her.
As regards the organic local reforms in administration and law which,
under the treaty of Berlin, were to be carried out in the European
provinces of the Empire, a Commission was appointed by the Great Powers
in 1880. The British representative was Lord Edmund Fitzmaurice, later
Lord Fitzmaurice. He took the leading part in drawing up a large and
complete scheme of reform, which was agreed to by the Commission and
was presented to the Sultan for his approval in accordance with the
treaty.
There followed, after these proceedings, a period of twenty-eight
years, up to 1908, during which Turkey, under the rule of Abdul Hamid,
was free from external war, and opportunity was therefore afforded
for giving effect to the promises by the Porte, guaranteed by the
treaty of Berlin, of reforms and improved administration in Macedonia
and other Balkan provinces left in its possession, and also in Crete
and Armenia. Except as regards Crete, not a single step, however, was
ever taken by the Porte to give effect to these promises. The scheme
of organic reform was never approved by the Sultan. It was treated as
waste-paper, like every other promise of reform in Turkey. Disorder and
misgovernment continued unabated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account