The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and DecayEversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
History
The Turkish Empire, Its Growth and Decay
Eversley, G. Shaw-Lefevre (George Shaw-Lefevre), Baron
Turkey -- History
The Turks thereupon evacuated Thessaly, and with them departed the last
of the Moslem beys or landowners. Though Greece had at the time a navy
superior in strength to that of the Porte, it effected nothing in the
war by sea. Turkish troops had been able to invade Crete, and were in
practical occupation of it. The four Powers, not including Germany,
whose Kaiser was already coquetting with the Sultan, with a view to a
future military alliance, then blockaded the island, occupied ports
on its coast, and ultimately compelled the Turkish troops to evacuate
it. In 1898 Prince George of Greece, a son of the King of Greece, was
appointed governor of the island at the suggestion of the Powers, and
the native assembly was recalled into existence. This arrangement was
obviously of a temporary nature. It lasted with growing friction till
the revolution in Turkey in 1908. When Austria annexed Bosnia and
Herzegovina, the Cretan Assembly proclaimed annexation to Greece, and
thenceforth the union of the island to the present kingdom was complete
and was fully recognized by the Powers.
The Great Powers were less successful in securing performance of the
promises of the Sultan under the treaty of Berlin in the case of
the Armenians. The Porte had undertaken by the treaty to carry out,
without delay, “the amelioration and reforms demanded for provinces
inhabited by Armenians and to guarantee their security against Kurds
and Circassians.” Periodic reports showing what reforms were effected
were to be laid before the Powers, who were also to superintend their
application. These provisions were the more important as they were
practically the conditions on which the provinces of Erzerum and
Bayezid, which had been occupied by the Russians in their invasion of
the Asiatic provinces of Turkey in 1877, were restored to the Porte.
It may be taken that, if the Powers had conceived it possible that
these promises would not be carried out, they would not have been
so cruel as to restore these two provinces, inhabited so largely by
Armenians, to Turkish rule. Lord Salisbury in 1888 did, in fact, use
strong language to the Porte on the subject of Armenia, and threatened
armed force if reforms were not carried out. In spite of this threat,
no reforms were effected. Mr. Gladstone, when he came into power again
in 1892, endeavoured to bring pressure on the Porte in favour of the
Armenians, but he met with no support from other Powers. Bismarck at
last intimated to him that the subject had better be allowed to drop.
Russia, it seems, was at that time engaged in the effort to induce the
Armenians inhabiting the districts round Kars, which had been ceded to
it under the treaty of Berlin, to give up their national Church and to
join the Greek Church. It was little disposed to give support to the
Armenians who remained subjects of the Porte.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account