Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
Any encroachment upon these sanctuaries of Islam by the
inauguration of non-Muslim control in whatever guise or form,
whether a protectorate or mandate, would be a direct violation of
the most binding religious injunctions of Islam and the deepest
sentiment of Muslims all the world over, and would, therefore, be
utterly unacceptable to the Mussulmans of India and the rest of
the Indian community. In this connection, apart from the religious
obligations to which we refer, the delegation would draw the
attention of the Supreme Council to the proclamation issued by
the Government of India, on behalf of His Britannic Majesty’s
Government, as also the Governments of France and Russia, on
November 2, 1914, in which it was specifically declared that ‘no
question of a religious character was involved’ in this war, and it
was further categorically promised that ‘the Holy Places of Arabia,
including the Holy Shrines of Mesopotamia and the port of Jedda,
will be immune from attack or molestation.’”
After pointing out that these were the lowest possible claims the
Mussulmans could set forth, the note went on as follows:
“But the Mussulmans of India have already submitted to the British
Government that a Turkish settlement made in disregard of their
religious obligations, on respect for which their loyalty has
always been strictly conditional, would be regarded by Indian
Mussulmans as incompatible with their allegiance to the British
Crown. This is a contingency which the Mussulmans of India, in
common with all their compatriots, constituting a population of
over three hundred millions, naturally view with the keenest
apprehension and anxiety, and are most earnestly desirous of
preventing by every means in their power. We believe that the
British Government, at any rate, is fully apprised of the range
and intensity of public feeling that has been aroused in India
on this question, and we content ourselves, therefore, by simply
stating here that the Khilafat movement represents an unprecedented
demonstration of national feeling and concern. Only on March 19
last, the day when the delegation was received by the British Prime
Minister, all business was suspended throughout the continent
of India by Mussulmans and Hindus alike, as a reminder and
reaffirmation of the Muslim case in respect of the future of the
Khilafat. This unprecedented yet peaceful demonstration involved a
loss of millions to the public at large, and was undertaken solely
with the object of impressing the authorities and others concerned
with the universality of Indian and Muslim sentiment on the
question. If, notwithstanding all constitutional and loyal
representations which the Mussulmans of India have put forward
on behalf of the obligation imposed upon them by their Faith, a
settlement is imposed upon Turkey which would be destructive of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account