Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
In view of the exactions of all sorts the Emir Feisal indulged in, such
as the capture of revenue lawfully belonging to the administration
of the Ottoman debt and the proscription of French currency, to say
nothing of such acts of aggression as attacks on French outposts and
the closing of the railways, General Gouraud on Wednesday, July 14,
addressed to the Arabian chief the following ultimatum, which expired
on the 18th:
“Recognition of the French mandate for Syria.
“Liberty to make use of the Rayak-Aleppo railway.
“The occupation of Aleppo and the stations lying between Aleppo and
Rayak.
“The immediate abolition of forced recruiting.
“Reduction of the Sherifian army to its effectives of December,
1919.
“Free circulation for the French-Syrian currency.
“Punishment of the authors of crimes against French soldiers.
“Acceptance of the above-mentioned conditions within four days. If
these conditions are not complied with, they shall be enforced by
arms.”
Syria, too, was in quite a perturbed state, owing to the discontent
prevailing among the population and the differences between the various
factions which were striving to get the upper hand in the country. Two
towns, Hasbeiya and Rashaya, situated on the slopes of Mount Hermon,
had rebelled against the Sherifian Government and wanted to become
parts of Lebanon.
An important debate began on July 19 in the House of Commons about the
condition of affairs in Asia Minor and the possible consequences the
French ultimatum addressed to the Emir Feisal might have for British
interests in that region.
Mr. Ormsby-Gore (Stafford, C.U.) asked the Prime Minister whether he
could give any information regarding the new military action of France
in Syria; whether the twenty-four hours’ ultimatum issued by the French
to the Arab Government in Damascus was submitted to and approved by the
Supreme Council; whether the terms of the mandate for Syria had yet
been submitted to the Allied and Associated Powers; and whether His
Majesty’s Government would use their influence with the French and Arab
Governments to secure the suspension of further hostilities pending the
decision of the Council of the League of Nations on the terms of the
Syrian mandate. To this Mr. Bonar Law answered:
“The ultimatum had not been submitted to the Supreme Council. The
terms of the mandate for Syria have not yet been submitted to
the Allied Powers. As regards the last part of the question, His
Majesty’s Government, who had for some time, but unsuccessfully,
been urging the Emir Feisal to come to Europe to discuss the
outstanding questions with the Supreme Council, do not consider
that they can usefully act upon the information at present at their
disposal, but they are in communication with the French Government
on the matter.”
Then Mr. Ormsby-Gore asked again:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account