Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“Every time Europe has conferred some benefit upon us we have been
thankful for it. I know the history of my country full well; in her
annals, many mistakes and evil doings have occurred, but not one
line relates one act of ingratitude. After allowing the Moslems
of Smyrna to be slaughtered by Hellenic soldiers and after having
hushed up this crime, Europe now wants—so it seems at least—to
drive us out of Constantinople and transfer the Moslem Khilafat
to an Anatolian town, as if it were a common parcel, or shelve it
inside the palace of Top-Kapu (the old Seraglio) like the antique
curios of the Museum. When the Turks shall have been expelled from
Constantinople, the country will be so convulsed that the whole
world will be shaken. Let nobody entertain any doubt about this: if
we go out of Constantinople a general conflagration will break out,
that will last for years or centuries, nobody knows, and will set
on fire the whole of the globe.
“At the time when Sultan Mohammed entered the town of
Constantinople, which had been praised and promised by Mohammed
to his people, the Moslem Empire of Andalusia was falling to
decay—that is to say, in the south-east of Europe a Moslem State
arose on the ruins of a Christian State, while in the south-west
of Europe a Christian State was putting an end to the life of a
Moslem State. The victor of Constantinople granted the Christian
population he found there larger religious privileges than those
granted to it by the Greek Empire. The ulcer of Phanar is still
the outcome of Sultan Mohammed’s generosity. What did Spain do
when she suppressed the Moslem State in the south-west of Europe?
She expelled the other religions, burning in ovens or sending to
the stake the Moslems and even the Jews who refused to embrace
Christianity. I mention this historical fact here, not to
criticise or blame the Spaniards, but to give an instance of the
way in which the Spaniards availed themselves of the conqueror’s
right Heaven had awarded them. And I contrast the Christians’
cruelty with the Turks’ gentleness and magnanimity when they
entered Constantinople!”
To adopt the policy advocated by Anglo-American Protestants was
tantamount to throwing Islam again towards Germany, who had already
managed to derive profit from its defence. Yet Islamism has no natural
propensity towards Germanism; on the contrary, Islam in the sixteenth
century, at the time of its modern development, intervened in our
culture as the vehicle of Eastern influences. That policy also hurt the
religious feelings of the Mussulmans and roused their fanaticism not
only in Turkey, but even in a country of highly developed intellectual
life like Egypt, and in this respect it promoted the cause of the most
spirited and most legitimate Nationalism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account