Treaty of Sèvres (1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions -- Turkey; World War, 1914-1918 -- Turkey
“I do not understand M. Mohammed Ali to claim indulgence for
Turkey. He claims justice, and justice she will get. Austria has
had justice. Germany has had justice—pretty terrible justice. Why
should Turkey escape? Turkey thought she had a feud with us. What
feud had Turkey with us? Why did she come in to try and stab us
and destroy liberty throughout the world when we were engaged in
this life-and-death struggle? Is there any reason why we should
apply a different measure to Turkey from that which we have meted
out to the Christian communities of Germany and Austria? I want
the Mohammedans in India to get it well into their minds that we
are not treating Turkey severely because she is Mohammedan: we are
applying exactly the same principle to her as we have applied to
Austria, which is a great Christian community.”
As to Arabia—which will be dealt with later on together with the
Pan-Arabian movement—though M. Mohammed Ali had declared that “the
delegation felt no anxiety about the possibility of an understanding
between the Arabs and the Khalifa,” and that the Moslems “did not want
British bayonets to subject the Arabs to Turkey,” Mr. Lloyd George
answered:
“The Arabs have claimed independence. They have proclaimed Feisal
King of Syria. They have claimed that they should be severed from
Turkish dominion. Is it suggested that the Arabs should remain
under Turkish dominion merely because they are Mohammedans? Is
not the same measure of independence and freedom to be given
to Mohammedans as is given to Christians? Croatia has demanded
freedom, and we have given it to her. It is a Christian community.
Syria has demanded it, and it is given to her. We are applying
exactly the same principles in Christian places, and to impose the
dominion of the Sultan upon Arabia, which has no desire for it, is
to impose upon Arabs something which we certainly would not dream
of imposing upon these Christian communities.”
With regard to Thrace, after owning it was difficult to give reliable
figures and saying that according to the Greek census and the Turkish
census, which differ but little, the Moslem population was in “a
considerable minority,” Mr. Lloyd George stated that “it would
certainly be taken away from Turkish sovereignty.” As to Smyrna, he
asserted that according to his information “a great majority of the
population undoubtedly prefers the Greek rule to the Turkish rule.”
Concerning the temporal power of the Khalifa, he seemed to have
forgotten the difference which had just been pointed out to him between
the Christian religion and Islam on this point, for he declared:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account