Criminals -- Fiction; Social problems -- Fiction; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918 -- Fiction
"Well, what do you say?"
"I have no private views that are not public ones; I can’t see any
distinction. I say that I would not take an oath that might oblige me
to vote to kill a man."
The atmosphere became tense.
"But assuming you had taken an oath, would you rather break that oath
than discharge your duty?"
"I wouldn’t take such an oath."
"Then you place your private opinions above the law, do you?"
"In this instance, I do. I don’t believe in that law, and I won’t help
enforce it."
"You mean,"--Glassford was plainly angry--"that you wouldn’t take an
oath to enforce a law you didn’t believe in?"
"That’s just what I mean."
Glassford looked an instant at Holden as if trying to decide what he had
better do with him for these heresies. Holden’s blue eyes were steady;
they returned Glassford’s gaze, seeming scarcely to wink. And just then
Eades, fearing the effect of the man’s scruples on the jury, thought
best to relieve the situation.
"We submit a challenge for cause," he said.
"Allowed," Glassford snapped. "We don’t want such men as you on
juries."
He whirled about in his chair, turned his back on Holden, and as Holden
walked directly from the courtroom, the eyes of all followed him, with a
strange interest in a man who was considered unfit for jury service
because he had principles he would not forego.
"Samuel Walker," called Gard.
An aged, doddering man tottered to the chair. He scarcely spoke in
answer to Eades’s questions; when he did, it was in the weak, quavering
voice of senility. He had no occupation, knew none of the lawyers, had
no knowledge of the case, had neither formed nor expressed opinions, and
had no scruples against capital punishment.
"You believe that the laws should be executed and upheld?" said Eades in
an insinuating tone.
"Heh?" said the old man, leaning forward with an open palm behind his
hairy ear.
Eades repeated the question and the fellow nodded.
Marriott turned in disgust from this stupid, senile man who was
qualified, as impatiently as Glassford had turned from the intelligent
man who was disqualified. And then, just as Walker was making for the
jury-box, Marriott used his last peremptory challenge.
A moment later he saw his mistake. Gard was calling a name he knew.
"William A. Broadwell."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account