Criminals -- Fiction; Social problems -- Fiction; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918 -- Fiction
Marriott argued, expostulated, pleaded, but in vain. The boy only shook
his head and said over and over, each time with a new access of terror:
"No, Eades would tear me to pieces."
"Come on, Gordon," called Glassford, who had finished his cigar, "we
can’t wait any longer."
The following morning, the defense having put in its evidence and
rested, Lamborn began the opening argument for the State. It had long
been Lamborn’s ambition to make a speech that would last a whole day.
He had made copious notes, and when he succeeded in speaking a full
half-hour without referring to them, he was greatly encouraged. When he
was compelled finally to succumb, and consult his notes, he began to
review the evidence, that is, he repeated what the witnesses had already
told. After that he began to fail noticeably in ideas and frequently
glanced at the clock, but he thought of the statutes, and he read to the
jury the laws defining murder in the first degree, murder in the second
degree, and manslaughter, and then declaring that the crime Archie had
committed was clearly murder in the first degree, he closed by urging
the jury to find him guilty of this crime.
In the afternoon Pennell opened the arguments for the defense. Having
won the oratorical contest at college, and having once been spoken of in
print as the silver-tongued, Pennell pitched his voice in the highest
key, and soon filled the court-room with a prodigious noise; he had not
spoken fifteen minutes before he had lashed himself into a fury, and
with each new, fresh burst of enthusiasm, he raised his hoarse voice
higher and higher, until the throats of his hearers ached in sympathy.
But at the end of two hours he ceased to wave his arms, no longer struck
the bar of the jury-box with his fist, the strain died away, and he sank
into his chair, his hair disheveled, his brow and neck and wrists
glistening with perspiration, utterly exhausted, but still wearing the
oratorical scowl.
All this time Eades and Marriott were lying back in their chairs, in the
attitudes of counsel who are reserving themselves for the great and
telling efforts of the trial, that is, the closing arguments. When
Marriott arose the next morning to begin his address, the silence was
profound. He looked about him, at Glassford, at Eades, at the crowd,
straining with curious, gleaming eyes. In the overflowing line of men
within the bar on either side of the jury-box he recognized several
lawyers; their faces were white against the wall; they seemed strange,
unnatural, out of place. The jury were uneasy and glanced away, and
though Broadwell lifted his small eyes to him, it was without response
or sympathy. Marriott was chilled by the patent opposition. Then,
somehow, he detected old man Reder stealing a glance at Archie; he kept
his eye on Reder. What was Reder thinking of? "Thinking, I suppose,"
thought Marriott, "that this settles it, and that there is nothing to do
now but to send Archie to the chair."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account