Criminals -- Fiction; Social problems -- Fiction; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918 -- Fiction
This man Mason was nearly fifty years old. His close-cropped hair and
his close-shaven beard gave his head and cheeks and lips a uniform color
of dark blue; his lips were thin and compressed from a habit of
taciturnity, his eyes were small, bright and alert; at any sound he
would turn quickly and glance behind him. He had spent twenty years in
prison--ten years in Dannemora, five in Columbus, three in Allegheny and
two in Joliet. This, however, did not include the time he had been shut
up in police stations, calabooses, county jails and workhouses. In the
present instance he had been arrested for pocket-picking, and had agreed
to plead guilty if the offense were reduced to petit larceny; the
authorities had accepted his proposal, and he had been sentenced to six
months in the workhouse. He had served four and a half months of his
sentence when Archie went into the workhouse.
The only time when Mason showed any marked sense of humor was when he
told Archie of his having confessed to pocket-picking. The truth was
that he was totally innocent of this crime, and if the police had been
wise they would have known this. Mason was a Johnny Yegg, that is, an
itinerant safe-blower. As a yegg man, of course, he never had picked a
pocket, and could not have done so had he wished, for he did not know
how; and if he had known how, still he would not have done so, for the
yeggs held such crimes as picking pockets in contempt. All of the terms
he had served in states’ prisons had been for blowing safes, and all of
the safes had been in rural post-offices. The technical charge was
burglary, though he was not a burglar, either, in the sense of entering
dwellings by night; this was a class of thieving left to prowlers. The
preceding fall, however, a safe had been blown in a country post-office
near the city, and Mason knew that the United States inspectors would
suspect him if they found him, and while he had been innocent of that
particular crime, he knew that this would make no difference to the
inspectors; they would willingly "job" him, as he expressed it,
justifying the act to any one who might question it--they would not need
to justify it to themselves--by arguing that if he had not blown that
particular safe he had blown others, so that the balance would be
dressed in the end. Consequently, when the police arrested him for
pocket-picking, he hailed it as a stroke of good fortune and looked on
the workhouse as an asylum. He had been a model prisoner, and had given
the authorities no trouble. He did this partly because he was a
philosophical fellow, patient and uncomplaining, partly because he did
not wish to attract attention to himself. His picture and his
measurements, taken according to the Bertillon system, were in every
police station in the land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account