The Two Sides of the ShieldYonge, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Mary)
General
The Two Sides of the Shield
Yonge, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Mary)
Domestic fiction; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
but as I watch these children with their parents I am quite convinced
that the being taken under Lily’s motherly wing is by far the best thing
that could have befallen Dolores, and that my absence is for her real
benefit as well as mine.’
The part between brackets was omitted by Miss Mohun in the public
reading, but the last sentence she did read, thinking it good for both
parties to hear it. However, Dolores both disliked the conclusion to
which her father had come, and still more that her aunt and cousins
should hear it, though, after all, it was only Gillian and Mysie who
remained to listen by the time the end of the letter was reached. The
long words had frightened away Valetta as soon as her appointed task of
work was finished.
Aunt Lily did not see the omitted sentence till the two sisters were
alone together later in the afternoon. It filled her eyes with tears.
‘Poor Maurice,’ she said; ‘he wrote something of the same kind to me.’
‘I expect we shall see him wonderfully shaken up and brightened when he
comes home. The numbness he talks of was half of it Mary’s dislike to us
all, only I never would let her keep me aloof from him.’
‘I almost wish he had taken Dolores out to Phyllis. I am not in the
least fulfilling his ideal towards her.’
‘Nor would Phyllis, unless the voyage had had as much effect on her as
it seems to have had upon Maurice. So you don’t get on any better?’
‘Not a bit. It is a case of parallel lines. We don’t often have
collisions--unless Wilfred gets an opportunity of provoking her.’
‘Why don’t you send that boy to school?’
‘I shall after Christmas. He is quite well now, and to have him at home
is bad both for himself and the others. He needs licking into shape
as only boys can do to one another, and he is not a model for Fergus,
especially since Harry has been away.’
‘What does he do?’
‘Nothing very brilliant, nor of the kind one half forgives for the
drollery of it. Putting mustard into the custard was the worst, I think;
inciting the dogs to bring the cattle down on the girls when they cross
the paddock; shutting up their books when the places are found--those
are the sort of things; putting that very life-like wild cat
chauffe-pied with glaring eyes in Dolly’s bed. I believe he does such
things to all, but his sisters would let him torture them rather than
complain, whereas Dolores does her best to bring them under my notice
without actually laying an information, which she is evidently afraid to
do. It is very unlucky that her coming should have been just when we
had such an element about--for it really gives her some just cause of
complaint.’
‘But you say he is impartial?’
‘Teasing is unfortunately his delight. He will even frighten Primrose,
but I am afraid there is active dislike making Dolores his favourite
victim; and then Val and Fergus, who don’t tease actively on their own
account, have come to enjoy her discomfiture.’
“And you go on the principle of ‘tolerer beaucoup?’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account