Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
Gentlemen’s clubs were once maintained for purposes of savage party
warfare; working men’s clubs of the same day assumed the same character.
Gentlemen’s clubs became places of quiet inoffensive recreation; working
men’s clubs began to follow suit. If working men have seemed rather slow
to appreciate advantages of combination which have saved the pockets of
gentlemen, and enhanced their comforts, it is because working men could
scarcely, for want of capital, originate such combinations without help;
and because help has not been separable from that great impertinence,
Patronage. The instinctive revolt of his spirit against patronage, is a
quality much to be respected in the English working man. It is the base
of the base of his best qualities. Nor is it surprising that he should
be unduly suspicious of patronage, and sometimes resentful of it even
where it is not, seeing what a flood of washy talk has been let loose on
his devoted head, or with what complacent condescension the same devoted
head has been smoothed and patted. It is a proof to me of his
self-control that he never strikes out pugilistically, right and left,
when addressed as one of ‘My friends,’ or ‘My assembled friends;’ that he
does not become inappeasable, and run amuck like a Malay, whenever he
sees a biped in broadcloth getting on a platform to talk to him; that any
pretence of improving his mind, does not instantly drive him out of his
mind, and cause him to toss his obliging patron like a mad bull.
For, how often have I heard the unfortunate working man lectured, as if
he were a little charity-child, humid as to his nasal development,
strictly literal as to his Catechism, and called by Providence to walk
all his days in a station in life represented on festive occasions by a
mug of warm milk-and-water and a bun! What popguns of jokes have these
ears tingled to hear let off at him, what asinine sentiments, what
impotent conclusions, what spelling-book moralities, what adaptations of
the orator’s insufferable tediousness to the assumed level of his
understanding! If his sledge-hammers, his spades and pick-axes, his saws
and chisels, his paint-pots and brushes, his forges, furnaces, and
engines, the horses that he drove at his work, and the machines that
drove him at his work, were all toys in one little paper box, and he the
baby who played with them, he could not have been discoursed to, more
impertinently and absurdly than I have heard him discoursed to times
innumerable. Consequently, not being a fool or a fawner, he has come to
acknowledge his patronage by virtually saying: ‘Let me alone. If you
understand me no better than _that_, sir and madam, let me alone. You
mean very well, I dare say, but I don’t like it, and I won’t come here
again to have any more of it.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account