Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
In France, upon the whole, these ceremonies are more sensibly regulated,
because they are upon the whole less expensively regulated. I cannot say
that I have ever been much edified by the custom of tying a bib and apron
on the front of the house of mourning, or that I would myself
particularly care to be driven to my grave in a nodding and bobbing car,
like an infirm four-post bedstead, by an inky fellow-creature in a
cocked-hat. But it may be that I am constitutionally insensible to the
virtues of a cocked-hat. In provincial France, the solemnities are
sufficiently hideous, but are few and cheap. The friends and townsmen of
the departed, in their own dresses and not masquerading under the
auspices of the African Conjurer, surround the hand-bier, and often carry
it. It is not considered indispensable to stifle the bearers, or even to
elevate the burden on their shoulders; consequently it is easily taken
up, and easily set down, and is carried through the streets without the
distressing floundering and shuffling that we see at home. A dirty
priest or two, and a dirtier acolyte or two, do not lend any especial
grace to the proceedings; and I regard with personal animosity the
bassoon, which is blown at intervals by the big-legged priest (it is
always a big-legged priest who blows the bassoon), when his fellows
combine in a lugubrious stalwart drawl. But there is far less of the
Conjurer and the Medicine Man in the business than under like
circumstances here. The grim coaches that we reserve expressly for such
shows, are non-existent; if the cemetery be far out of the town, the
coaches that are hired for other purposes of life are hired for this
purpose; and although the honest vehicles make no pretence of being
overcome, I have never noticed that the people in them were the worse for
it. In Italy, the hooded Members of Confraternities who attend on
funerals, are dismal and ugly to look upon; but the services they render
are at least voluntarily rendered, and impoverish no one, and cost
nothing. Why should high civilisation and low savagery ever come
together on the point of making them a wantonly wasteful and contemptible
set of forms?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account