Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
Sometimes, these Alms-Houses belong to a Company or Society. Sometimes,
they were established by individuals, and are maintained out of private
funds bequeathed in perpetuity long ago. My favourite among them is
Titbull’s, which establishment is a picture of many. Of Titbull I know
no more than that he deceased in 1723, that his Christian name was
Sampson, and his social designation Esquire, and that he founded these
Alms-Houses as Dwellings for Nine Poor Women and Six Poor Men by his Will
and Testament. I should not know even this much, but for its being
inscribed on a grim stone very difficult to read, let into the front of
the centre house of Titbull’s Alms-Houses, and which stone is ornamented
a-top with a piece of sculptured drapery resembling the effigy of
Titbull’s bath-towel.
Titbull’s Alms-Houses are in the east of London, in a great highway, in a
poor, busy, and thronged neighbourhood. Old iron and fried fish, cough
drops and artificial flowers, boiled pigs’-feet and household furniture
that looks as if it were polished up with lip-salve, umbrellas full of
vocal literature and saucers full of shell-fish in a green juice which I
hope is natural to them when their health is good, garnish the paved
sideways as you go to Titbull’s. I take the ground to have risen in
those parts since Titbull’s time, and you drop into his domain by three
stone steps. So did I first drop into it, very nearly striking my brows
against Titbull’s pump, which stands with its back to the thoroughfare
just inside the gate, and has a conceited air of reviewing Titbull’s
pensioners.
‘And a worse one,’ said a virulent old man with a pitcher, ‘there isn’t
nowhere. A harder one to work, nor a grudginer one to yield, there isn’t
nowhere!’ This old man wore a long coat, such as we see Hogarth’s
Chairmen represented with, and it was of that peculiar green-pea hue
without the green, which seems to come of poverty. It had also that
peculiar smell of cupboard which seems to come of poverty.
‘The pump is rusty, perhaps,’ said I.
‘Not _it_,’ said the old man, regarding it with undiluted virulence in
his watery eye. ‘It never were fit to be termed a pump. That’s what’s
the matter with _it_.’
‘Whose fault is that?’ said I.
The old man, who had a working mouth which seemed to be trying to
masticate his anger and to find that it was too hard and there was too
much of it, replied, ‘Them gentlemen.’
‘What gentlemen?’
‘Maybe you’re one of ’em?’ said the old man, suspiciously.
‘The trustees?’
‘I wouldn’t trust ’em myself,’ said the virulent old man.
‘If you mean the gentlemen who administer this place, no, I am not one of
them; nor have I ever so much as heard of them.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account