Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
On Saturday nights, when there is a greater stir than usual outside, and
when itinerant vendors of miscellaneous wares even take their stations
and light up their smoky lamps before the iron railings, Titbull’s
becomes flurried. Mrs. Saggers has her celebrated palpitations of the
heart, for the most part, on Saturday nights. But Titbull’s is unfit to
strive with the uproar of the streets in any of its phases. It is
religiously believed at Titbull’s that people push more than they used,
and likewise that the foremost object of the population of England and
Wales is to get you down and trample on you. Even of railroads they
know, at Titbull’s, little more than the shriek (which Mrs. Saggers says
goes through her, and ought to be taken up by Government); and the penny
postage may even yet be unknown there, for I have never seen a letter
delivered to any inhabitant. But there is a tall, straight, sallow lady
resident in Number Seven, Titbull’s, who never speaks to anybody, who is
surrounded by a superstitious halo of lost wealth, who does her household
work in housemaid’s gloves, and who is secretly much deferred to, though
openly cavilled at; and it has obscurely leaked out that this old lady
has a son, grandson, nephew, or other relative, who is ‘a Contractor,’
and who would think it nothing of a job to knock down Titbull’s, pack it
off into Cornwall, and knock it together again. An immense sensation was
made by a gipsy-party calling in a spring-van, to take this old lady up
to go for a day’s pleasure into Epping Forest, and notes were compared as
to which of the company was the son, grandson, nephew, or other relative,
the Contractor. A thick-set personage with a white hat and a cigar in
his mouth, was the favourite: though as Titbull’s had no other reason to
believe that the Contractor was there at all, than that this man was
supposed to eye the chimney stacks as if he would like to knock them down
and cart them off, the general mind was much unsettled in arriving at a
conclusion. As a way out of this difficulty, it concentrated itself on
the acknowledged Beauty of the party, every stitch in whose dress was
verbally unripped by the old ladies then and there, and whose ‘goings on’
with another and a thinner personage in a white hat might have suffused
the pump (where they were principally discussed) with blushes, for months
afterwards. Herein Titbull’s was to Titbull’s true, for it has a
constitutional dislike of all strangers. As concerning innovations and
improvements, it is always of opinion that what it doesn’t want itself,
nobody ought to want. But I think I have met with this opinion outside
Titbull’s.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account