Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; London (England) -- Description and travel
One thing had perplexed me very much in going from bed to bed. A very
significant and cruel thing. I could find no young man but one. He had
attracted my notice, by having got up and dressed himself in his
soldier’s jacket and trousers, with the intention of sitting by the fire;
but he had found himself too weak, and had crept back to his bed and laid
himself down on the outside of it. I could have pronounced him, alone,
to be a young man aged by famine and sickness. As we were standing by
the Irish soldier’s bed, I mentioned my perplexity to the Doctor. He
took a board with an inscription on it from the head of the Irishman’s
bed, and asked me what age I supposed that man to be? I had observed him
with attention while talking to him, and answered, confidently, ‘Fifty.’
The Doctor, with a pitying glance at the patient, who had dropped into a
stupor again, put the board back, and said, ‘Twenty-four.’
All the arrangements of the wards were excellent. They could not have
been more humane, sympathising, gentle, attentive, or wholesome. The
owners of the ship, too, had done all they could, liberally. There were
bright fires in every room, and the convalescent men were sitting round
them, reading various papers and periodicals. I took the liberty of
inviting my official friend Pangloss to look at those convalescent men,
and to tell me whether their faces and bearing were or were not,
generally, the faces and bearing of steady respectable soldiers? The
master of the workhouse, overhearing me, said he had had a pretty large
experience of troops, and that better conducted men than these, he had
never had to do with. They were always (he added) as we saw them. And
of us visitors (I add) they knew nothing whatever, except that we were
there.
It was audacious in me, but I took another liberty with Pangloss.
Prefacing it with the observation that, of course, I knew beforehand that
there was not the faintest desire, anywhere, to hush up any part of this
dreadful business, and that the Inquest was the fairest of all possible
Inquests, I besought four things of Pangloss. Firstly, to observe that
the Inquest _was not held in that place_, but at some distance off.
Secondly, to look round upon those helpless spectres in their beds.
Thirdly, to remember that the witnesses produced from among them before
that Inquest, could not have been selected because they were the men who
had the most to tell it, but because they happened to be in a state
admitting of their safe removal. Fourthly, to say whether the coroner
and jury could have come there, to those pillows, and taken a little
evidence? My official friend declined to commit himself to a reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account