The unconscious : $b The fundamentals of human personality, normal and abnormalPrince, Morton
Science
The unconscious : $b The fundamentals of human personality, normal and abnormal
Prince, Morton
Psychology, Pathological; Subconsciousness
Of course it is a question how far the findings in a particular and
apparently specially favorable subject are applicable to people in
general. I would say, however, that I have substantially confirmed these
observations in another subject, B. C. A., when in apparent health. In
this latter subject the richness of the fringe and what may be called
the ultra-marginal region in conscious states is very striking. The same
is true of O. N. (cf. Lecture VI, p. 174). Again in psychasthenics,
suffering from attacks of phobia, association, or habit psycho-neuroses,
etc., I have been able to recover, after the attack has passed off,
memories of conscious states which during and preliminary to the attack
were outside the focus of attention. Of some of these the subject had
been dimly aware, and of some apparently entirely unaware (i.e., they
were coconscious). For the former as well as the latter there followed
complete amnesia, so that the subject was ignorant of their previous
presence, and believed that the whole content of consciousness was
included in the anxiety or other state which occupied the focus of
attention. Consequently I am in the habit, when investigating a
pathological case, like an obsession, of inquiring (by technical
methods) into the fringe of attention and even the ultra-marginal
region, and reviving the ideas contained therein, particularly those for
which there is amnesia. My purpose has been to discover the presence of
ideas or thoughts which as a setting would explain the meaning of the
idea which was the object of fear (a phobia), the exciting cause of
psycho-neurotic attacks, etc. To this I shall presently return.
If all that I have said is true, it follows that the _whole content or
field of consciousness at any given moment includes not only
considerably more than that which is within the field of attention but
more than is within the field of awareness_. The field of conscious
states as a whole comprises the focus of attention plus the marginal
fringe; and besides this there may be a true subconscious ultra-marginal
field comprising conscious states of which the personal consciousness is
not even dimly aware. We may schematically represent the relations of
the different fields by a diagram (Fig. 1).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account