American fiction -- 20th century; Divorce -- Fiction; Married people -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
Some young men are made cynical by the perception of the workings of
free competition; others simply thoughtful. Gordon was among the
latter. Life presented itself to him from a new perspective, and if it
suddenly appeared both perplexing and distressing, it appeared none the
less interesting. His personal dismay, if this passing reaction
deserves so harsh a term, was transient, but it was the precursor to
graver, disinterested musings. His attention once arrested by the
inequalities of life turned further afield and became riveted by
concern and by pity. Why in this city, established under free
institutions, was it necessary that thousands should be living in
poverty, ignorance, and social ineffectiveness if not degradation? It
ought not to be. It must not be. How could it be averted? This
outburst of his protesting spirit encountered the query of his
dispassionate mind--what remedy do you suggest? It was like a douche
of cold water. Instinctively he reached out for help. He knew that he
was in search of truth this time, but he abhorred an _ignis fatuus_.
He began to ask questions and to read. There were various answers on
the lips of those whom he consulted, for the question seemed to be in
the air. Many, and there were among them some whose broad shoulders,
free carriage, and prosperously self-reliant air told of that joy in
living and practical, world-conquering serenity typical of the
successful man of the present generation, who assured him, often in a
whisper, as though it were a confidence, that these inequalities must
always exist. Were not men's abilities different, and would they not
always be so? Was it just that one man's energy and skill should be
curtailed to keep pace with another's incapacity? What would become of
human individuality and brilliancy if everyone's earning and owning
were to be circumscribed by metes and bounds, and we were all to become
commonplace, unimaginative slaves of socialism? It was right, of
course, that existing abuses in the way of long hours and insufficient
pay should be rectified. That was on the cards. In many cases it had
been already consummated. And what had malcontents or critics of the
existing industrial system to say to the long list of splendid
benefactions--free libraries, free hospitals, free parks, and free
museums--given to the community by rich men--men who had been abler and
more progressive than their fellows? Surely the world would be a dull
place without competition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account