American fiction -- 20th century; Divorce -- Fiction; Married people -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
"You're simply depressed, Paul, and no wonder," said Gordon, with
genial solicitude. "But we mustn't judge our plutocracy--aristocracy,
or whatever you choose to call the personal representatives of the
prosperity of the country--by the antics of a few, disgusting as they
are. I agree that their behavior apes the frivolity and license of the
old French court without its elegance, and I don't suppose that the
founders of our institutions ever included a leisure class as a part of
their scheme. Absorbed in ideals, they neglected to take poor human
nature sufficiently into account. We have lost the buffalo, but we
have acquired a leisure class, and we must make the best of it, not the
worst. We can't cut their heads off; this is a free country. It would
be dreadful--dreadful, wouldn't it, if our institutions, of which we
are so proud, were to produce merely the same old thing over again--a
leisure class of voluptuaries?" Gordon paused for a moment and his
smile died away at the vision which his words evoked. "I don't intend
to believe it; you don't. There are students of destiny who maintain
that nations rise, reach maturity and decline by regular economic laws,
but that human nature never really improves. That's fatalism. The
free play of human individualism is having its last grand chance here
in these United States. If our aristocracy proves no better than any
other--if the rich and powerful are to sneer at morals and wallow in
licentiousness, we couldn't blame society if it should try a strong
dose of socialism, with its repressing, monotonous dead level, rather
than accept the doctrine that the law of supply and demand is the sole
ruler of the universe. But as good Americans we can't afford to judge
our plutocracy, as yet, by the vices of a few people at Newport."
"They sin in such a cold-blooded way," said Paul. "If they really
cared, as some of the foreigners do, one could understand; but they
don't."
"I know. It's one of the canons of old-world traditions that adultery
is almost redeemed by the possession of an artistic sense. To commit
the one without possessing the other, may be no worse morally, yet it
seems much more vulgar. But we mustn't take them too seriously, even
though they are our countrymen and women. They are the exceptions--the
excrescences. Look at your father, for instance. He belongs to
them--but he is not of them. The same is true of yourself; and it is a
privilege, with all its responsibilities, a privilege I envy you. Who
wouldn't be a multi-millionaire if he could? What is more alluring
than power?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account