American fiction -- 20th century; Divorce -- Fiction; Married people -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
Mr. Prentiss nodded. "You are a Unitarian, I judge."
"I was brought up in the Unitarian faith. Like most American men, I
believe in the power of the individual to work out his own salvation."
"But what message have you for a world of sinners?" asked the rector,
trenchantly.
"I appreciate the force of your criticism. I am conscious that the
weakness of Unitarianism--of individual liberty of conscience--is its
coldness, that it does not constantly hold out to the degenerate soul
the lure of a new spiritual birth. It is for this reason largely that
your Church and the Catholic Church have gained fresh converts in this
country and this city. Moreover, those churches have promoted among us
picturesqueness, color, and sentiment. But, on the other hand, their
spirit is autocratic if not aristocratic, and in their love for the
pomp of the ages, in their fealty to the so-called vested rights of
civilization, they have little sympathy with the rational, every-day
reasoning of republican democracy."
Mr. Prentiss pursed his lips. There was no offence in the speaker's
manner or tone which would justify a rebuke; on the contrary, they both
suggested that he was trying to speak dispassionately. But the
conclusions stirred the rector's blood, and he tightened his folded
arms.
"You seem to forget that the spirit of Christian philanthropy, of the
loving brotherhood of man, is the controlling emotional force in the
Episcopal--yes, in the Roman Church to-day. You yourself are familiar,
for example, with the work of my Mr. Starkworth in the Church of the
Redeemer."
"Yes. But neither Church has compassion on the misery of common
humanity when to relieve it would conflict with the hard and fast
letter of church law. That is where--and notably in this matter of
recognizing divorce--the other Protestant churches, the Presbyterian,
the Methodist and the Baptist, have been more tolerant. They have
refused to insist that it is for the benefit of mankind that, under all
circumstances, men and women unhappily married should remain in durance
vile without the possibility of escape, or, having escaped, should be
condemned by precept to celibacy for the rest of their lives. And
these are sects whose creed is based on the essential sinfulness of
human nature."
The rector glowered at Gordon for a moment from under his brows. "Then
where will you draw the line?" This was Mr. Prentiss's trump card. It
expressed his utter weariness with what he regarded as the foul system
of conflicting and irresponsible legislation, unceasingly and
scandalously availed of.
"That brings us to your second proposition!" exclaimed Gordon. "As to
whether the State is faithless to its duty. Have you a copy of the
public laws, Mr. Prentiss?"
"Assuredly." The rector strode across the room and taking down two
large volumes from the book-shelf presented them to his visitor. It
gratified him to demonstrate by this practical test the broadness of
his humanity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account