American fiction -- 20th century; Divorce -- Fiction; Married people -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
Constance consented to be taught typewriting and stenography at the
expense of Mrs. Randolph Wilson. She decided that to refuse an offer
which would enable her presently to become self-supporting would be
false pride. She acknowledged as sound, under her present
circumstances, Mr. Prentiss's assertion that it was no less the duty of
the unfortunate to accept bounty within proper limits than of the
prosperous to give. She consented also at his instance to call upon
her benefactress.
Any encouragement on the part of Constance would have induced Mr.
Prentiss to raise a subscription to pay off the second mortgage on the
house incurred by Emil, and thus provide her with a home. But at the
first hint of such a thing she shook her head decisively. A very
different thought was in her mind. Emil was still alive and liable for
the bills which he had incurred for the expenses of the canvass, but
she felt that the six hundred dollars which he had withheld from his
client as an enforced loan must be paid at once or the good name of her
children would be tarnished. His appropriation of this money on the
eve of his disappearance was damning in its suggestion; but she had
thankfully adopted and was clinging tenaciously to the explanation
proffered by one of the easy-going and good-natured co-tenants of the
office occupied by her husband, that the money had been borrowed to
carry out a speculation, and that Emil had meant to return it. Did not
the broker's report of the purchase and sale, found among the papers in
Emil's desk, support this? She realized fully that from the mere
stand-point of legal responsibility his motive was immaterial. But
with her knowledge of his characteristics and of the past she felt that
she had the right to insist on the theory that he had been led astray
by sanguine anticipations which, as usual, had been disappointed. His
conduct had been weak and miserable, and exposed him to obloquy, but it
was not the same as deliberate theft. As a mother, she was solicitous
to treat the transaction as a loan and to repay it without delay. The
world might not discriminate, but for herself and for the children the
distinction was essential.
Having been informed how matters stood, and that there was probably
still some small value left in the house over and above the two
mortgages, she thought she saw an opportunity to discharge this vital
obligation. Accordingly, when she found that the clergyman was still
considering means for rescuing her home, she disclosed her theory and
her purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account