The Unfinished Programme of DemocracyRoberts, Richard
Philosophy
The Unfinished Programme of Democracy
Roberts, Richard
Democracy; Social history
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter V.
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF FREEDOM.
“When we say that one animal is higher than another, we mean that it
is more able to control its own destiny. Progress is just this:
Increase in Freedom.”—STEWART MCDOWALL.
“Ne vous laissez pas tromper par de vaines paroles. Plusieurs
chercheront a vous persuader que vous êtes vraiment libres, parce
qu’ils auront écrit sur une feuille de papier le mot de liberté et
l’auront affiché à tous les carrefours.
La liberté n’est pas un placard qu’on lit au coin de la rue. Elle
est une puissance vivante qu’on sent en soi et autour de soi, le
génie protecteur du foyer domestique, la garantie des droits
sociaux, et le premier de ces droits.
* * * * *
La liberté luira sur vous quand, a force de courage et de
persévérance, vous vous serez affranchis de toutes ces servitudes.”
LAMENNAIS.
I
POLITICAL and religious freedom cannot be complete without the winning
of economic freedom. That economic dependence cuts the nerve of all
freedom needs no proof; the history of landownership is full of
instances—even in recent times—of the coercion of dependants in matters
of opinion and religious observance. So long as one man’s subsistence
depends upon the will of another, it is foolish to suppose that he can
in any real sense be free; and it is to be counted for righteousness to
the Trade Unions that by binding the workers together, they have been
able to resist encroachments on the part of the vested interests upon
liberty of thought and conscience. Nevertheless, while the present
acceptances of the industrial order prevail, the worker still lacks that
liberty of the person without which the liberty of the mind, the crown
and safeguard of all liberty, can never be more than partial. It is true
that the serf was tied to the land in a way in which the modern worker
is not tied to his job. Yet the difference is more apparent than real;
for the worker has obtained this freedom at the cost of that security of
subsistence which the serf did undoubtedly to some extent enjoy. The
worker may also choose his master as the serf could not; but it is
nevertheless the choice of _a master_, a man who dictates the terms and
conditions of employment, except in so far as the principle of
collective bargaining has succeeded in entering in and modifying the
magisterial power of the employer. Freedom of thought and conscience is
a vain thing except a man be able to translate thought into act and to
obey the injunctions of his conscience; and so long as a system,
industrial or other, imposes restrictions upon a man’s control of his
own person, he does not possess that mobility with which his own
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account