The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
History
The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1920 ed.]
Wallace, W. Stewart (William Stewart)
American loyalists; United Empire loyalists
Grave inconvenience was doubtless caused in many cases by the delay of
the commissioners in making their awards. But on the other hand it should
be remembered that the commissioners had before them a portentous task.
They had to examine between four thousand and five thousand claims. In
most of these the amount of detail to be gone through was considerable,
and the danger of fraud was great. There was the difficulty also of
determining just what losses should be compensated. The rule which was
followed was that claims should be allowed only for losses of property
through loyalty, for loss of offices held before the war, and for loss
of actual professional income. No account was taken of lands bought or
improved during the war, of uncultivated lands, of property mortgaged
to its full value or with defective titles, of damage done by British
troops, or of forage taken by them. Losses due to the fall in the value
of the provincial paper money were thrown out, as were also expenses
incurred while in prison or while living in New York city. Even losses
in trade and labour were discarded. It will be seen that to apply these
rules to thousands of detailed claims, all of which had to be verified,
was not the work of a few days, or even months.
It must be remembered, too, that during the years from 1783 to 1790 the
British government was doing a great deal for the Loyalists in other
ways. Many of the better class received offices under the crown. Sir John
Johnson was appointed superintendent of the Loyalists in Canada, and
then superintendent of Indian Affairs; Colonel Edmund Fanning was made
lieutenant-governor of Nova Scotia; Ward Chipman became solicitor-general
of New Brunswick. The officers of the Loyalist regiments were put on
half-pay; and there is evidence that many were allowed thus to rank as
half-pay officers who had no real claim to the title. ‘Many,’ said the
Rev. William Smart of Brockville, ‘were placed on the list of officers,
not because they had seen service, but as the most certain way of
compensating them for losses sustained in the Rebellion’; and Haldimand
himself complained that ‘there is no end to it if every man that comes
in is to be considered and paid as an officer.’ Then every Loyalist who
wished to do so received a grant of land. The rule was that each field
officer should receive 5000 acres, each captain 3000, each subaltern
2000, and each non-commissioned officer and private 200 acres. This rule
was not uniformly observed, and there was great irregularity in the
size of the grants. Major Van Alstine, for instance, received only 1200
acres. But in what was afterwards Upper Canada, 3,200,000 acres were
granted out to Loyalists before 1787. And in addition to all this, the
British government clothed and fed and housed the Loyalists until they
were able to provide for themselves. There were those in Nova Scotia
who were receiving rations as late as 1792. What all this must have
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account