The United States and Latin AmericaLatané, John Holladay
History
The United States and Latin America
Latané, John Holladay
Latin America -- Foreign relations -- United States; United States -- Foreign relations -- Latin America
It is true, as the high contracting parties assume, that the
United States have, on their part, claims to urge against
Mexico. Upon due consideration, however, the President is of
opinion that it would be inexpedient to seek satisfaction of
their claims at this time through an act of accession to the
convention. Among the reasons for this decision which the
undersigned is authorized to assign, are, first, that the
United States, so far as it is practicable, prefer to adhere
to a traditional policy recommended to them by the father of
their country and confirmed by a happy experience, which
forbids them from making alliances with foreign nations;
second, Mexico being a neighbor of the United States on this
continent, and possessing a system of government similar to
our own in many of its important features, the United States
habitually cherish a decided good-will toward that republic,
and a lively interest in its security, prosperity, and
welfare. Animated by these sentiments, the United States do
not feel inclined to resort to forcible remedies for their
claims at the present moment, when the government of Mexico
is deeply disturbed by factions within, and exposed to war
with foreign nations. And of course, the same sentiments
render them still more disinclined to allied war against
Mexico, than to war to be waged against her by themselves
alone.
In conclusion, Mr. Seward referred to the fact that the United States
government had authorized their representative in Mexico to enter into a
treaty conceding to the Mexican government material aid, which might, he
hoped, enable that government to satisfy the just claims and demands of
the allied sovereigns and so to avert the war which they have agreed
among each other to levy against Mexico.[205]
As already related, the efforts of the executive in this direction were
not approved by the Senate and the negotiations in regard to
guaranteeing the interest on the Mexican loan were broken off. The
treaty negotiated by Mr. Corwin was in fact never submitted to the
Senate, for by the time it was ready the French forces occupied a part
of Mexican territory, and it was feared that a loan to Mexico under
such conditions would be considered a breach of neutrality.
In pursuance of the London convention, Vera Cruz was occupied in the
early part of 1862 by a Spanish force of 6,000 men under command of
Marshal Prim; a French force of 2,500, which was largely reinforced soon
afterward; and a force of 700 British marines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account