The United States and Latin AmericaLatané, John Holladay
History
The United States and Latin America
Latané, John Holladay
Latin America -- Foreign relations -- United States; United States -- Foreign relations -- Latin America
The crown of Mexico was formally offered to Maximilian by a deputation
of Mexicans headed by Senor Estrada, October 3, 1863; but Maximilian
replied that he could not accept the proffered throne until the whole
nation should "confirm by a free manifestation of its will the wishes of
the capital." This was a wise decision, had it been given in good faith
and had it been wisely adhered to, but the sequel shows that the
archduke was either not sincere in his protestations or else was
woefully deceived by representations subsequently made to him. Six
months later he accepted the crown without the question having been
submitted to the wishes of any but a very small portion of the Mexican
people.
In spite of the declaration of the Mexican Assembly, which showed so
unmistakably the hand of Napoleon, the French government continued to
repudiate the designs imputed to it against the independence of Mexico,
and Mr. Seward continued to express, officially at least, the
satisfaction of the American government at the explanations vouchsafed
by France. September 11, 1863, he stated the case as follows:
When France made war against Mexico, we asked of France
explanations of her objects and purposes. She answered, that
it was a war for the redress of grievances; that she did not
intend to permanently occupy or dominate in Mexico, and that
she should leave to the people of Mexico a free choice of
institutions of government. Under these circumstances the
United States adopted, and they have since maintained entire
neutrality between the belligerents, in harmony with the
traditional policy in regard to foreign wars. The war has
continued longer than was anticipated. At different stages
of it France has, in her intercourse with us, renewed the
explanations before mentioned. The French army has now
captured Pueblo and the capital, while the Mexican
government, with its principal forces, is understood to have
retired to San Luis Potosi, and a provisional government has
been instituted under French auspices in the city of Mexico,
which being supported by arms, divides the actual dominion
of the country with the Mexican government, also maintained
by armed power. That provisional government has neither made
nor sought to make any communication to the government of
the United States, nor has it been in any way recognized by
this government. France has made no communication to the
United States concerning the provisional government which
has been established in Mexico, nor has she announced any
actual or intended departure from the policy in regard to
that country which her before-mentioned explanations have
authorized us to expect her to pursue.[219]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account