The United States and Latin AmericaLatané, John Holladay
History
The United States and Latin America
Latané, John Holladay
Latin America -- Foreign relations -- United States; United States -- Foreign relations -- Latin America
After repeated efforts to promote the reestablishment of diplomatic
relations between Venezuela and Great Britain and after repeated offers
of its good offices for the purpose of bringing about an adjustment of
the controversy, President Cleveland finally determined to intervene in
a more positive manner with a view to forcing, if need be, a settlement
of the controversy. This resolution on the part of the American
executive, with a full statement of its views on the general principles
involved in the dispute, was forwarded to Mr. Bayard for transmission to
the British government in Mr. Olney's dispatch of July 20, 1895.[244]
After reviewing the history of the controversy Mr. Olney stated in the
following concise form what he considered the important features of the
situation as it then existed:
1. The title to territory of indefinite but confessedly very
large extent is in dispute between Great Britain on the one
hand and the South American republic of Venezuela on the
other.
2. The disparity in the strength of the claimants is such
that Venezuela can hope to establish her claim only through
peaceful methods--through an agreement with her adversary
either upon the subject itself or upon an arbitration.
3. The controversy, with varying claims on the part of Great
Britain, has existed for more than half a century, during
which period many earnest and persistent efforts of
Venezuela to establish a boundary by agreement have proved
unsuccessful.
4. The futility of the endeavor to obtain a conventional
line being recognized, Venezuela for a quarter of a century
has asked and striven for arbitration.
5. Great Britain, however, has always and continuously
refused to arbitrate, except upon the condition of a
renunciation of a large part of the Venezuelan claim and of
a concession to herself of a large share of the territory in
controversy.
6. By the frequent interposition of its good offices at the
instance of Venezuela, by constantly urging and promoting
the restoration of diplomatic relations between the two
countries, by pressing for arbitration of the disputed
boundary, by offering to act as arbitrator, by expressing
its grave concern whenever new alleged instances of British
aggression upon Venezuelan territory have been brought to
its notice, the government of the United States has made it
clear to Great Britain and to the world that the controversy
is one in which both its honor and its interests are
involved and the continuance of which it cannot regard with
indifference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account