The United States and Latin AmericaLatané, John Holladay
History
The United States and Latin America
Latané, John Holladay
Latin America -- Foreign relations -- United States; United States -- Foreign relations -- Latin America
In view of the opposition which the plan encountered in Congress, the
instructions to the American delegates were very carefully drawn by
Secretary Clay and their powers were strictly limited. They were
cautioned against committing their government in any way to the
establishment of "an amphictyonic council, invested with power finally
to decide controversies between the American states or to regulate in
any respect their conduct. Such a council might have been well enough
adapted to a number of small contracted states, whose united territory
would fall short of the extent of that of the smallest of the American
powers. The complicated and various interests which appertain to the
nations of this vast continent cannot be safely confided to the
superintendence of one legislative authority. We should almost as soon
expect to see an amphictyonic council to regulate the affairs of the
whole globe. But even if it were desirable to establish such a
tribunal, it is beyond the competency of the government of the United
States voluntarily to assent to it, without a previous change of their
actual constitution."
The delegates were also instructed to oppose the formation of an
offensive and defensive alliance between the American powers, for, as
Mr. Clay pointed out, the Holy Alliance had abandoned all idea of
assisting Spain in the conquest of her late colonies. Continuing, he
said:
Other reasons concur to dissuade the United States from
entering into such an alliance. From the first establishment
of their present constitution, their illustrious statesmen
have inculcated the avoidance of foreign alliances as a
leading maxim of their foreign policy. It is true, that in
its adoption, their attention was directed to Europe, which
having a system of connections and of interests remote and
different from ours, it was thought most advisable that we
should not mix ourselves up with them. And it is also true,
that long since the origin of the maxim, the new American
powers have arisen, to which, if at all, it is less
applicable. Without, therefore, asserting that an exigency
may not occur in which an alliance of the most intimate kind
between the United States and the other American republics
would be highly proper and expedient, it may be safely said
that the occasion which would warrant a departure from that
established maxim ought to be one of great urgency, and that
none such is believed now to exist. Among the objections to
such alliances, those which at all times have great weight
are, first, the difficulty of a just and equal arrangement
of the contributions of force and of other means between the
respective parties to the attainment of the common object;
and secondly, that of providing beforehand, and determining
with perfect precision, when the _casus foederis_ arises,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account