You know the story of Sophocles' _Antigone_: how, when two brothers
disputed the throne of Thebes, one, Polynices, was driven out and
brought a foreign host against the city. Both brothers fall in battle.
Their uncle takes up the government and publishes an edict that no one
shall give burial to the traitor who has borne arms against his native
land. The obligation to give or allow decent burial, even to an enemy,
was one which the Greeks held peculiarly sacred. Yet obedience to the
orders of lawful authority is an obligation binding on every citizen. No
one dares to disregard the king's order save the dead man's sister. She
is caught in the act and brought before the king. 'And thou,' he says,
'didst indeed dare to transgress this law?' 'Yes,' answers Antigone,
'for it was not Zeus that published me that edict; not such are the laws
set among men by the Justice who dwells with the Gods below; nor deemed
I that thy decrees were of such force that a mortal could override the
unwritten and unfailing statutes of heaven. For their life is not of
to-day or yesterday but from all time, and no man knows when they were
first put forth.'[22]
There you have the assertion of a law supreme and binding on all men,
eternal, not to be set aside by human enactment.
And now turn to this passage from the traveller and historian Herodotus,
an almost exact contemporary of Sophocles. He has been telling how
Cambyses, king of the Persians, has been wantonly insulting the
religion and customs of the Egyptians. 'The man must have been mad,' he
says:
'For if one was to set men of all nations to make a choice of the
best laws out of all the laws there are, each one upon
consideration would choose those of his own country: so far do
men go in thinking their own laws the best. Therefore it is not
likely that any but a madman would cast ridicule on such things.
And that all men do think thus about their laws may be shown by
many proofs, and above all by this story. For when Darius was
king he called to him the Greeks who were at his court and asked
them, 'How much money would you take to eat your fathers when
they die?' And they answered that they would not do this at any
price. After this Darius called the men of an Indian tribe called
the Kallatiai, who eat their parents, and asked them in the
presence of the Greeks, who were told by an interpreter what was
said, 'How much money would you take to burn with fire your
fathers when they die?' And they cried with a great voice that he
should speak no such blasphemy. Thus it is that men think, and I
hold that Pindar spoke rightly in his poem when he said that law
was king over all.'[23]
There you have law, king over men and gods, but a capricious monarch
commanding here this, there that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account